1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
igor_vitrenko [27]
2 years ago
14

What is the disadvantage of getting line managers to recruit for a firm?

Business
1 answer:
tankabanditka [31]2 years ago
3 0

Answer: B) They have to take time out from their actual jobs.

Explanation: Line managers are often referred to personnels in an organization who are in charge if a particular department or sector and hence, charged with the responsibility of handling and overseeing the performance of particular employees and output of his or her department. This puts line managers in a position of knowing the employees in his or her department, what the department needs in terms of personnel in other to raise and drive productivity. However, charging line managers with the responsibility of recruiting for the organization will result in the disruption of their actual job role and will definitely have to take time out in other to facilitate the recruitment process which will definitely have an effect on their performance and actual duty.

You might be interested in
Root and Vine is a gardening collective and local delivery service started by two friends. Their clientele has grown, and they w
Zanzabum

The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by your question is the second choice or letter B. They could put up a partnership which <span>might best suit their growth.

</span>
A partnership<span> is a single business where two or more people share ownership. Each </span>partner<span> contributes to all aspects of the business, including money, property, labor or skill. In return, each </span>partner<span> shares in the profits and losses of the business.</span>


I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Suppose that Italy and Sweden both produce rye and cheese. Italy's opportunity cost of producing a pound of cheese is 5 bushels
mars1129 [50]

Answer:

Italy has a comparative advantage in the production of cheese

Explanation:

Suppose that Italy and Sweden both produce rye and cheese.

Italy's opportunity cost of producing a pound of cheese is 5 bushels of rye while Sweden's opportunity cost of producing a pound of cheese is 10 bushels of rye.

<u>By comparing the opportunity cost of producing cheese in the two countries, you can tell that Italy has a comparative advantage in the production of cheese because it has a lower opportunity cost (as a matter of fact half the cost) in comparison with Sweden.</u>

<u>Comparative advantage is an economic term that refers to an economy's ability to produce goods and services at a lower opportunity cost than that of trade partners</u>

6 0
2 years ago
Interpretation of intelligence test scores is based on the assumption that the scores are normally distributed within a populati
Finger [1]

Answer: According to complete question "more than two-thirds of children will score between 85 and 115".

Explanation:

The solution to this issue is it, even though the Wechsler Ratios of Intellect scores are "standardized" to an average of 100 and a margin of error of 15 based on the standardized system used only to start scoring IQ.

So between 85 and 115 will be 68 that for each cent of the results.

Therefore the result stand between 85-115.

3 0
3 years ago
When the interest rate in the economy was 10 percent, the price of a bond with no expiration date that paid a fixed annual inter
Nina [5.8K]

Answer:

Option D $8333

Explanation:

The value of the irredeemable bond can calculated using the Dividend Valuation Model.

The formula for the computation is:

Value of the Bond = Interest paid / rate of return on a similar bond

Value of the Bond = $500 / 6% = $8333.33

Note that initially the bond was worth $5000 which can be calculated with the same formula:

Value of the Bond = $500 / 10% = $5000

The net increase is $3333

So the correct answer is option D.

7 0
3 years ago
Nancy sold three capital assets that were held for investment. She sold stock in ABC Corporation for a gain of $10,000; stock in
wlad13 [49]

Answer:

D) $3,000 deduction against ordinary income with a $5,000 capital loss carried forward to offset income for next year

Explanation:

Note: This question is not complete as it does not include the options. The complete question is therefore presented before answering the questions follows:

Nancy sold three capital assets that were held for investment. She sold stock in ABC Corporation for a gain of $10,000; stock in XYZ Corporation for a gain of $2,000; and corporate bonds for a loss of $20,000. Assuming all of the investments had a long-term holding period, how will the transactions be treated for tax purposes?

A) Gain of $12,000 taxed at 15% and a loss of $20,000 deductible against ordinary income

B) Net loss of $8,000 that is fully deductible against ordinary income in the current year

C) Net loss of $8,000 that results in no deduction in the current year, but can be carried forward to offset capital gains for the next year

D) $3,000 deduction against ordinary income with a $5,000 capital loss carried forward to offset income for next year

The explanation to the answer is therefore presented as follows:

The first step is to compute the net capital gain (loss) is as follows:

Particulars                                                                            $  

Gain from the sale of stock in ABC Corporation          10,000

Gain from the sale of stock in XYZ Corporation            2,000

Loss from the sale of corporate bonds                     <u>  (20,000)  </u>

Net capital gain (loss)                                              <u>     (8,000)  </u>

In the US, individuals are allowed to use up to $3,000 to reduce their taxable income in the first year of the loss, while the remaining capital losses will be carried over to the next years.

From the net capital gain computed above, the correct option is D. That is, the $8,000 loss will be treated for tax purposes as a $3,000 deduction against ordinary income in the current year with the remaining $5,000 capital loss carried forward to offset income for next year.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • You own some equipment that you purchased four years ago at a cost of $287,000. The equipment is five-year property for MACRS. T
    14·1 answer
  • This information relates to Sunland Co.. 1. On April 5, purchased merchandise from Blossom Company for $26,400, terms 4/10, n/30
    8·1 answer
  • Diego is in the Strange Situation with his caregiver; he explores the room and examines the toys that have been placed in it. He
    7·1 answer
  • In accounting for uncollectible receivables, the balance in Allowance for Doubtful Accounts will directly impact the amount of t
    5·1 answer
  • [The following information applies to the questions displayed below.]
    9·1 answer
  • RJ Custom Bike Manufacturing has determined that the demand for the products and services offered by them is less elastic. With
    11·1 answer
  • Job A3B was ordered by a customer on September 25. During the month of September, Jaycee Corporation requisitioned $2,300 of dir
    8·1 answer
  • Tune Store reports inventory using the lower of cost and net realizable value (NRV). Information related to its year-end invento
    9·1 answer
  • The Federal Reserve carries out open-market operations, buying $2 million worth of Treasury Bills from banks. This action increa
    13·1 answer
  • Strategic planning starts with a _____ that reflects a firm’s vision, purpose, and values.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!