1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
irinina [24]
3 years ago
10

Write a generalization about the kinds of people who might have supported each party

History
1 answer:
arlik [135]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Explanation:

Republicans and Democrats see little common ground between the two parties when it comes to issues, ideas and ideology. Majorities of partisans say the policy positions of the Republican and Democratic parties are very different, and neither Republicans nor Democrats say the other party has many good ideas.

In general terms, both Republicans and Democrats agree with their own party’s policies. In-party agreement extends to specific issues, such as policies to deal with the economy, health care and immigration.

Partisans broadly agree with own party’s policies across issue areasHowever, there are some issue areas – climate change for Republicans and policies to deal with ISIS for Democrats – where somewhat smaller majorities of partisans say they agree with their own party’s approach. Even then, few partisans express agreement with the other party on these issues.

Overall, about seven-in-ten Republicans (71%) and Democrats (70%) say they generally agree with their party’s positions almost always or more than half the time. Even larger majorities – 84% of Republicans and 82% of Democrats – disagree with the other party’s positions at least most of the time.

Most Republicans and Democrats also agree with their own party’s policies on a range of specific issues, including the economy, immigration, health care and policies to deal with the Islamic militant group in Iraq and Syria.

However, the shares agreeing with their own party vary by issue, and the patterns of agreement are different within the two parties.

You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP URGENT!! 90 POINTS AND BRAINLIEST FOR WHOEVER ANSWER THIS
Neko [114]

The United States choice to give military help to France and the Associated States of Indochina was come to casually in February/March 1950, supported by the President on May 1, 1950, and was reported on May 8 of that year.

The choice was taken notwithstanding the U.S. want to keep away from direct association in a pilgrim war, and notwithstanding a detecting that France's political-military circumstance in Indochina was awful and was disintegrating.

Also, expectations that U.S. help would accomplish a stamped distinction over the span of the Indochina War were intensely qualified.

The circumstance in which the choice was made was totally overwhelmed by the assume control of and union of intensity in China by the socialists.

Patriot Chinese powers had been pulled back from terrain China and Communist Chinese troops had touched base on the outskirt of Indochina in late 1949.

This period was the high water characteristic of U.S. fears of direct Chinese Communist intercession in Indochina. hope this helps :D

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A result of the British policy of salutary neglect is seen in what example?
oee [108]
The correct answer is
<span>The colonies developed an ability for self-governing

Basically, the salutary neglect was a policy where the British parliament made laws but didn't enforce them in the colonies. This was meant to help keep the support of the colonists. They governed themselves and this is another reason why the intolerable acts were intolerable. </span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the new deal change American political thinking
lukranit [14]

Answer:

federal government should attempt to solve social and economical problems

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Which term might a loyalist have used to describe a patriot gathering or committee?
ehidna [41]

Answer:

Letter B: Unlawful

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
How would you explain the rise of napoleon
Mnenie [13.5K]

Answer:

Napoleon's rise to power can be explained through his military exploits. ... Napoleon also defeated the British army in Egypt at the Battle of the Pyramids. In 1799, he was part of a group that overthrew the French Directory. Napoleon's status as a commoner and war hero made him popular with the French masses.

Explanation:

Just look it up lol

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What are the meaning or unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness
    15·1 answer
  • The Fundamental Orders of Connecticut document was directly influenced by the _____.
    12·1 answer
  • True or False: Religion serves as a powerful agent of social control, encouraging conformity to the norms of society.
    9·1 answer
  • The Balfour Declaration was a public letter written by the British foreign secretary and drafted in support of the Zionist goal
    13·2 answers
  • WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!! After the Island-Hopping Campaign, the United States drew even closer to Japan with victories at what tw
    11·1 answer
  • How is John Locke ideas used today
    9·1 answer
  • All traties must be made with the advice and consent of the
    13·1 answer
  • In the pledge, to have “ _________ for all” means our country needs laws that are fair to all people.
    8·1 answer
  • Use this chart to list details about the daily lives of people under slavery. Describe at least three details for each category.
    11·1 answer
  • Halppppppp i need to get my grade up and i dont understand thissssss
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!