All categories

3 years ago

What’s the answer to this?

Mathematics

1 answer:

frosja888 [35]3 years ago

5 0

Your answer is C, the third one

You might be interested in

Someone please help :)

larisa86 [58]

The answer is 6m djsjdjjsskskksksksksksksmsmsm

8 0

3 years ago

Help ASAp will give brainliest!!!!!!!

anzhelika [568]

Answer:

x = 51

Step-by-step explanation:

2x + 4 + x + 23 = 180

3x + 27 = 180

3x = 153

x = 51

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Point G is the midpoint of PQ. <br> PG equals 2X plus 3 and GQ equals 5X -5. what is X?

borishaifa [10]

Answer:

$x=\frac{8}{3}=2\frac{2}{3}\approx{2.667}$

Step-by-step explanation:

$\overline{PG}=2x+3\\\overline{GQ}=5x-5$

Since they're equidistant (equal distances), we can set them equal to one another and solve for x:

$2x+3=5x-5$

Adding 5 to both sides:

$2x+8=5x$

Subtracting 2x from both sides:

$8=3x$

Dividing both sides by 3:

$\frac{8}{3}=x$

Therefore:

$x=\frac{8}{3}=2\frac{2}{3}\approx{2.667}$

6 0

3 years ago

Write a story problem that would model the sum of the arrows in the number diagram below. The first part of your story should re

dalvyx [7]

ImAbananaImAbananaImAbanana ImAbanana ImAbananaImAbananaImAbanana ImAbanana ImAbananaImAbananaImAbanana ImAbanana ImAbananaImAbananaImAbanana ImAbanana ImAbananaImAbananaImAbanana ImAbanana ImAbananaImAbananaImAbanana ImAbanana ImAbananaImAbananaImAbanana ImAbanana ImAbananaImAbananaImAbanana ImAbanana ImAbananaImAbananaImAbanana ImAbanana ImAbananaImAbananaImAbanana ImAbanana ImAbananaImAbananaImAbanana ImAbanana

3 0

3 years ago

100 points! Please help asap! Look at the picture attached. My teacher said that both 1 and 2 are neither can someone explain wh

Neko [114]

Answer:

Your teacher is right, there is not enough info

Step-by-step explanation:

<h3>Question 1</h3>

We can see that RS is divided by half

The PQ is not indicated as perpendicular to RS or RQ is not indicates same as QS

So P is not on the perpendicular bisector of RS

<h3>Question 2</h3>

We can see that PD⊥DE and PF⊥FE

There is no indication that PD = PF or ∠DEP ≅ FEP

So PE is not the angle bisector of ∠DEF

6 0

3 years ago