1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Evgesh-ka [11]
3 years ago
12

What was one effect of the Spanish-American War?

History
1 answer:
77julia77 [94]3 years ago
5 0

The only correct answer is the first statement, A. This war is considered by most historians as the entry of the United States in the age of New Imperialism.

New Imperialism is how historians call several European and other nations like the U.S. colonizing territories throughout the world to get access to more consumer markets and source materials.

The Spanish-American war is better classified as the Spanish-American-Cuban-Filipino War. This way we don't lose sight of all the interests and nations that were involved.

After the war of 1898, the U.S. had new territories that would support new areas of commerce. Hawaii, for example, was annexed in this context and served to protect American ships that started to continuously pass by. Puerto Rico and Cuba gave access to Latin America markets. Hawaii, Guam, and Philippines opened access to China.

You might be interested in
According the graph, the number of troops deployed to Vietnam in 1969 would most likely
Alexxx [7]

The correct answer is "escalate."

According to the graph, the number of troops deployed to Vietnam in 1969 would most likely escalate.

The graphic attached shows a continual increase in the number of United States troops sent to Vietnam, since 1961. However, what happened, in reality, was that after the Tet Offense, millions of Americans started to question the reason why the US was sending more troops to the Vietnam War. American people started to state that Vietnam was not an American War. People started to took the streets to organize protests and demonstrations, demanding the federal government to withdraw the troops from Vietnam.

Years later,  the Pentagon Papers indicated that the United States had been secretly involved in Vietnam before its official involvement.

The United States Department of Defense had a secret report about military involvement in the War of Vietnam. They called the Pentagon Papers. Daniel Ellsberg, a military analyst in the case, considered in 1968 that the information should be released to the public. In March 1971, he gave a copy of the papers to the New York Times. The papers showed how previous administrations had misled public information about the involvement of the US in Vietnam.

8 0
2 years ago
Why is Loyalty Important to our world today? And why should citizens display this trait?
anyanavicka [17]

Answer:

Some people says that religion is the law to be loyal. But not very sure thts the case

8 0
2 years ago
What was the effect of television on the development and outcome
Zarrin [17]

Answer:

Explanation:The conventional wisdom has generally been that for better or for worse it was an anti-war influence. It brought the “horror of war” night after night into people's living rooms and eventually inspired revulsion and exhaustion.

8 0
3 years ago
Help!
pogonyaev

The American Revolution was not a civil war because  a “civil war” is typically between two groups within the same country.  For instance, Parliament and the King fought each other in the English Civil War. Similar conflicts occurred between the Union and the Confederacy during the American Civil War.

Contrarily, the American Revolution was a conflict between a colonizer and a colony. Usually, these are not referred to as "civil wars," but rather as "rebellions," "revolts," or (to their supporters) "wars of liberation."

Any of these might constitute a "revolution," so long as it alters society, the economy, and culture fundamentally as well as the leadership. As you can expect, this makes the word "revolution" very political. The proponents of change refer to it as a "revolution," whilst the opponents use a less admirable term.

The Civil War would have been referred to as a "revolution" if the Confederacy had prevailed, and the Union may have even done so at some point. Instead, it fell short, and now we refer to the conflict of 1861–1865 as a civil war. It's just another instance of how the winners write history.

5 0
2 years ago
I NEED HELP ASAP PLZZZ
NARA [144]

Answer:

I would assume it would be the second sentence. I would see the picture that well but from what i could see, that would probably be the most reasonable answer....if it is wrong then I am sooo sorry.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is a reason to why Portuguese traders and sailors attempted to find an all water route to Asia?
    14·1 answer
  • What program paid people to build post offices, paint buildings, take photographs, put on plays, etc?
    15·1 answer
  • 4. The first settlers at Jamestown faced many hardships which were largely caused by -
    9·1 answer
  • Read the quotation by Booker T. Washington. "More and more, we must learn to think not in terms of race or color, or language, o
    8·2 answers
  • The structure of the Athenian government divided the populations of neighborhoods and villages into
    14·2 answers
  • How did the British start/effect the American Revolution?
    13·1 answer
  • PLEASE ANSWER ALL OF THESE FOR ME AND I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST, FIVE STARS, A THANKS YOU, AND A SHOUT OUT
    9·1 answer
  • The gasoline-powered automobile was invented in .<br><br> 1833<br> 1893<br> 1823
    10·2 answers
  • In ancient Sparta, which group was responsible for doing most of the farming?
    13·1 answer
  • What is the answer to question 12 and 13
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!