Please help I have one question.

Priya, variable "p", jumped 3 inches more than Xeno, “x”, in a high jump contest. Mai, “m”, jumped three times as many inches hi

IceJOKER [234]

Answer:

Xeno jumped 1 2/3 in

Step-by-step explanation:

if Mai jumped 3 times higher than Priya dividing Mai's 14 by 3 would get Priya's height. Then by subtracting 3 from Priya's height, which is 4 2/3, you get Xeno's height which is 1 2/3 in

4 0

3 years ago

How do I solve −6 + 9(8 − 2b) using distributive property or combining like terms.

Levart [38]

Answer:

66-18b

Step-by-step explanation:

-6+72-18b

66-18b

solving for b

b=3.66 or 3 and 2/3

7 0

3 years ago

I NEED HELP I WILL MARK YOU BRAINLIST

natta225 [31]

Answer:

B. -2 1/2 +3 1/4 = 3/4

Step-by-step explanation:

the starting point is -2 1/2, they added 3 1/4, and the ending point is 3/4.

6 0

3 years ago

The least-squares regression model y =−3.4+5.2x and correlation coefficient r=−0.66 were calculated for a set of bivariate data

Makovka662 [10]

Answer:

$r=\frac{n(\sum xy)-(\sum x)(\sum y)}{\sqrt{[n\sum x^2 -(\sum x)^2][n\sum y^2 -(\sum y)^2]}}$

For this case the value of r = -0.66

Now we can calculate the determination coeffcient:

$r^2 = (-0.66)^2 = 0.4356$

And then we can conclude that 43.56% of the variation in y can be explained by the explanatory variable

And then 100-43.56 = 56.44 % of the variation in y that cannot be explained by the explanatory variable

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case we need to calculate the slope with the following formula:

$m=\frac{S_{xy}}{S_{xx}}$

Where:

$S_{xy}=\sum_{i=1}^n x_i y_i -\frac{(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i)(\sum_{i=1}^n y_i)}{n}$

$S_{xx}=\sum_{i=1}^n x^2_i -\frac{(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i)^2}{n}$

$\bar x= \frac{\sum x_i}{n}$

$\bar y= \frac{\sum y_i}{n}$

And we can find the intercept using this:

$b=\bar y -m \bar x$

And the model obtained for this case is:

$y = -3.4 +5.2 x$

The correlation coefficient is a "statistical measure that calculates the strength of the relationship between the relative movements of two variables". It's denoted by r and its always between -1 and 1.

And in order to calculate the correlation coefficient we can use this formula:

$r=\frac{n(\sum xy)-(\sum x)(\sum y)}{\sqrt{[n\sum x^2 -(\sum x)^2][n\sum y^2 -(\sum y)^2]}}$

For this case the value of r = -0.66

Now we can calculate the determination coeffcient:

$r^2 = (-0.66)^2 = 0.4356$

And then we can conclude that 43.56% of the variation in y can be explained by the explanatory variable

And then 100-43.56 = 56.44 % of the variation in y that cannot be explained by the explanatory variable

8 0

3 years ago

a circle is divided into 18 equal parts how many degrees is the angle for each part? how many degrees is the angle for 5 parts?

Ket [755]

There are 360 degrees in a circle, and we have 18 pieces, so we need to see how many times 18 goes into 360. We can find this out by dividing.

360/18=20

You can check this by multiplying 20 and 18 (it equals 360)!

So, each fraction of the circle will be 20 degrees.

If you take 5 of these 20 degree pieces, you'll need to multiply them by 20 to see how many degrees they'd be.

You need to multiply by 20 because each piece is 20 degrees, and we need to find how many degrees 5 pieces is. It's the same as doing
20+20+20+20+20! :)

20*5=100. 5 parts will be 100 degrees.

Hope I helped! :)

4 0

3 years ago