1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
harina [27]
3 years ago
11

What are some potential benefits and potential costs of total war, and do the potential benefits ever outweigh the costs ?

History
2 answers:
dimaraw [331]3 years ago
8 0

The concept of "total war" refers to a type of armed conflict that is bound by no rules or limitations in terms of who is being attacked, the weapons that are used or the elements of society that will be sacrificed to win it.

Engaging in this type of war can have some benefits, such as:

  • There is no need for the government to define its objectives clearly.
  • Because of it, there is no accountability between the government and its citizens, which gives them free reign of action.
  • Countries with a strong military can use their full power.

However, the costs far outweigh the benefits:

  • Increased cost of human lives, from all parties involved.
  • The destruction of all civil society.
  • Because civil society is so disrupted, government institutions are likely to collapse as well.
  • Extremely difficult recovery process, both politically as economically.
  • Complete depletion of the country's resources.
  • Violation of human rights and the laws of just war.
  • Closes the door to any peaceful solution.

There is rarely, if ever, a situation in which a total war provides benefits that would outweigh the costs of it, or that would not be achieved through some other means.

igomit [66]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The concept of "total war" refers to a type of armed conflict that is bound by no rules or limitations in terms of who is being attacked, the weapons that are used or the elements of society that will be sacrificed to win it.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Please explain the two different types of Nazi Camps. 5. What king of camp was Sobibor? DC 6. Why were the Russian Prisoners of
77julia77 [94]

The correct answers to these open questions are the following.

The two different types of Nazi Camps were the following.

The Nazi built two types of Nazi camps: concentration camps and extermination camps.

Concentration camps were used by the Nazis to take prisoners and contain them. In these camps, Jewish people were prisoners and were forced to labor in extremely harsh conditions. Thousands of people died in these camps due to the exhaustive work.

On the other hand, extermination camps were built to kill people and bury them there. Nazis built gas chambers where they killed millions of people.

Sobibor was an extermination camp and was located in Poland.

Russian Prisoners of War (POWS) were sent to Sobibor because there they could die from mass starvation.

4 0
3 years ago
Explain this quote from George Washington : " Thirteen (states) pulling against each other, and all tugging at the... head (cent
BlackZzzverrR [31]
The states fighting against each other and not agreeing will cause the united states to continue to be united and become the downfall of the usa
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Choose all that apply.
saul85 [17]
Justinian I was an emperor well known for establishing a long lasting rule of law with the help of his wife. 
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which side seemed stronger at the beginning of the Civil War?
natita [175]

The correct answer is:

North because its government had been in power longer

Explanation:

With Lincoln's election in 1861, Southern states believed they were no longer represented in the federal government, so they started to secede from the Union,<em> forming the Confederate States of America and naming Jefferson Davis as President. </em>

The North seemed stronger at the beginning of the Civil War (and it turned out it was) because the Union had been in power longer, and President Lincoln was the official President to the entire world, even though the South tried to win support from European countries. The federal government had power over the army and had naval power to block Southern ports and their economy.

The North also seemed stronger because of their bigger population and advanced industries.


3 0
3 years ago
Which nation was the aggressor in the action described here? the soviet union japan germany italy?
meriva

The answer for above statement is:

Germany


Explanation:

Between 1939 and Gregorian calendar month 1941 the German army invaded and occupied several countries, as well as Holland, Belgium, Luxembourg, France, Denmark, Yugoslavia, Greece, Kingdom of Norway and Western Poland.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What racial term did the nazi’s use for themselves? what was the ethnic make up of this people
    8·1 answer
  • About how much tobacco was exported to England from the southern colonies in 1745?
    13·1 answer
  • the abbreviations BC an AD are still commonly used to label different eras of world history. The fact supports which of the foll
    15·1 answer
  • In the United States the largest number of sheep are raised in the _____.
    6·2 answers
  • How did the first state constitutions address the concern that power should remain in the hands of the people?
    11·1 answer
  • State two characteristics of ramapithecus
    9·1 answer
  • 5. List the democratic rights we enjoy today whose origins can be traced to the
    12·1 answer
  • What was the name of the U.S. policy that aimed to slow the spread of
    11·1 answer
  • you have been hired within your company to be the creator and producer of a new podcast on historical topics. You are being task
    15·1 answer
  • 7.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!