It could be argued that probably the most lasting contribution of Napoleon's rule was "<span>D. his legal code," since although Napoleon could be ruthless, he was often seen as an "enlightened despot". </span>
Of all the option given about the dollar diplomacy of United States, the correct answer is “U.S. Dollar Diplomacy in Latin America was often accompanied by military intervention”.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The Dollar Diplomacy of United States was all about foreign policy which aided for the creation of stability promoting the American interest in commerce over the globe through China and West Africa.
But the foreign policy was intervened with military intervention accompanying to the Latin America. The dollar diplomacy failed to create the stability in commercial interest with the failure of aim to abandon the military intervention from the Latin America in due course of revolutionary times.
Answer:
France and England
Explanation:
France and England were the two countries who had land claims in Canada. The treaty ending the French Indian War, in 1763, relinquished France's land claims in Canada.
Answer:
Explanation:
Amendments may be proposed either by the Congress with a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a convention of states called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures.[1] To become part of the Constitution, an amendment must be ratified by either—as determined by Congress—the legislatures of three-quarters of the states or state ratifying conventions in three-quarters of the states.[2] The vote of each state (to either ratify or reject a proposed amendment) carries equal weight, regardless of a state's population or length of time in the Union. Article V is silent regarding deadlines for the ratification of proposed amendments, but most amendments proposed since 1917 have included a deadline for ratification. Legal scholars generally agree that the amending process of Article V can itself be amended by the procedures laid out in Article V, but there is some disagreement over whether Article V is the exclusive means of amending the Constitution.
