The option with the commas is the best written sentence
Answer: I don't completely know what excerpt you are talking about, but from what I've searched up, I'm going to assume this is the correct one.
Explanation: The effects of using an omniscient narrator in this excerpt that it allows readers to see both Beatrice’s and Luma’s sides of the story.
What is omniscient narrator?
Omniscient narrator, often seen speaking in the voice of the author himself, assumes the omniscient idea of the subject being discussed: deep down in private thoughts, which tells about hidden or secret events.
What is an omniscient person?
Omniscient person who has all the knowledge or infinite awareness.
Hence, the correct answer is Option A
I'm not understanding the question, friend
The statement is partially correct, the laws would be extreme in numbers and there would be far more punishments than a state with a moderate amount of laws. There would be more laws or regulations broken or violated when it would regard certain things. But the number of laws however does not exactly show how corrupt the state may be, but how extensive or extreme the punishments for the crime would be.
