Eleanor is researching the effect social media has on worldwide political awareness and revolution. Felix is examining the effec
t World of Warcraft has on the romantic relationships of middle-aged men in his metro area. Eleanor’s analysis is ________, while Felix’s analysis is ________.A. Micro-level; macro-level B. Macro-level; micro-level
C. They are both macro-level.
D. They are both micro-level.
From the question, we have the following information: Eleanor
and Felix are probablyy a sociologists since Eleanor and Felix are researching something or topic pertaining to sociology(that is the studies of how the society react or performs). Eleanor is going to use the Macro-level analysis because Eleanor research is wide, big, or large and it involves Nations and so on. So, if you also need to understand more about the society as a whole you will have to use the type of analysis Eleanor will use -- MACRO- LEVEL ANALYSIS.
Felix will be using MICRO- LEVEL ANALYSIS because Felix research deals with particular or specific groups interactions or relationships.
<em>Macro-level analysis</em>, examines societies, considering broad patterns, systems, institutions that shape these societies. It involves forces ranging from social, economic to political, impacting members of societies. Macro-level analysis is done on a larger scale and though capturing data over wide spans, does not include intimate details which micro-level analysis could provide.
<em>Micro-level analysis</em> examines in details personal interactions between individuals. It covers a smaller population scale and provides an exposure to intimacy of day to day interactions as well as impacts of specific altering factors on individuals. These individuals could be members of a very small group or single entities.
Answer: Abolitionist John Brown lead a small group on a raid against a federal armory in Harpers Ferry, Virginia, in an attempt to start an armed slave revolt and destroy the institution of slavery.
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the kind of cognitive distortion that this is would be overgeneralization. This is a mental thought process in which you generalize a single experience to all the experiences that you are having now and in the future. Which is what Jarl is doing by stating that he is stupid for making a mistake in his french class. Most likely because he has done it before.
<span>less the effect of experimenter bias
The eyewitness hope impact (likewise called the experimenter-anticipation impact, experimental bias , onlooker impact, or experimenter impact) is a type of reactivity in which a specialist's subjective predisposition makes them intuitively impact the members of a test.</span>
