Follow what the teachers say.
<span>Actually, to be totally frank, there is one school of thought that says we never really find out if Romeo and Juliet had 'true love' for each other. The tragedy of the play 'Romeo and Juliet'by William Shakespeare is, of course, that they both die so young that they (and we) never get to find out if it was lasting love or infatuation. Romeo, though, knows what infatuative 'love' is. It is more like 'love of self' and often people are in love with the way the other special person makes them feel, rather than experiencing a 'giving' kind of love which relies more on caring for the other person and their needs. Many readers like to believe that Romeo has already experienced this kind of infatuative love and so would recognise it if turned up again - if his love for Juliet feels different, then we can hope he realises it is not the same as the superficial feelings he had for Rosaline</span>
Please post the question properly
Answer:
I'm not positive but I believe it's "It adds humor to the story because Mitty imagines himself as a brave hero, while readers see him as meek and henpecked."
Explanation:
He's acting as a Captain managing a ship in a cresus; Making him see himself as an admirable hero, where as the reader knows it's just a fantasy he sees making them mark him as henpecked and meek. Henpecked; continually criticize and give orders to (His wife) Meek; quiet, gentle, and easily imposed on; submissive
