Answer:
In the distribution of scarce resources, caste systems rely on ascribed statuses and class systems rely on achieved statuses. (letter D)
Explanation:
Class systems present a social hierarchy that results from a person's achievements, that is, through their effort. For instance, you can be born poor but end up wealthy by gaining knowledge that will lead you to better job opportunities. Therefore, this type of system has social mobility. It also allows for interactions between classes.
On the other hand, a caste systems is more rigid. Its statuses depend on what you already possess at birth, on what is ascribed to you. That is, your gender, race, wealth, etc. are all determined by your family, by what you are born with. This type of system does not allow for much mobility.
Answer: d) Fence sitting.
Explanation:
Fence sitting is the situation were a person is unable to decide between two options present in any argument, questioning, competition etc.This indecisiveness can be due to lack of courage or confusion.
According to the question, fence sitting concept is not applicable on results obtained from research of Dr.Gore as mostly students are able to make decision about the question.Thus, lack of decisiveness is not shown through this scenario.
Other options are incorrect because yea-saying, response set and acquiescence are not the factors that lack to define opting between two or more side in any situation or argument.Thus, the correct option is option(d).
I believe the answer is: negative reinforcement
Negative reinforcement refers to the type of reinforcement a form of reinforcement that make a subject become uncomfortable to the point where the subject would do some efforts to avoid or eliminate the negative reinforcement (just like the horrendous ding sound)
<span>talking the most, interrupting the other person, and changing the topic most often are all common indicators of lack of social manners and attention issues. </span>
