Answer: Negatively
Explanation:
Enlightenment ideas were not completely against monarchs but did have problems with the absolute nature of the rule of said monarchs.
Before Enlightenment, monarchs generally ruled as they pleased with the logic being that they had the right to rule from God and so had the right to control the nation as their personal property.
Enlightenment was against this and instead espoused the logic that a monarch was only able to rule due to a social contract signed between them and the people whereby they would be allowed to rule provided they took care of their subjects.
Monarchs reacted to this with negativity because it meant that they had to stop being so selfish with resources and had to share power with the people. As time went on however, and with constant pressure on them, they had to relent and it led to the dissolution of several monarchies in Europe and the transition of others to Constitutional Monarchies.
#1) What are transportation and information services?
Answer: Agency or department responsible for providing processed or published information on specific topics to an organization's internal users, its customers, or the general public. The purpose of this services is to provide security and protection for citizens and businesses.
Answer:
Liberal and conservative theories of the state tend to see the state as a neutral entity separated from society and the economy. These theories treat the economic system of capitalism as a given. Marxist theories see the state as a partisan instrument that primarily serves the interests of the upper class.
Explanation:
Answer:
need to protect; outweighs
Explanation:
The court gave the permission that in cases that have to do with such criminal offences if the victim is 14 or less than 14 at the time of the offence, and if they were 16 years or less at the time of testimony, the child's testimony has to be gotten through closed-circuit television.
The court decided in this court case that the need for the child to be protected is more than the rights of the defender to confront the accuser.
