1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
labwork [276]
3 years ago
15

g Donald’s employer fires Donald after only four months on the job, a clear breach of Donald’s written twelve-month employment c

ontract. Donald is entitled to recover as damages:
Business
1 answer:
insens350 [35]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Compensatory Damages

Explanation:

Based on this scenario it can be said that Donald is entitled to Compensatory Damages. This is a lawsuit that covers the loss that the non-breaching party incurred as a result of the breach of contract. In this scenario, Donald's employer breached the contract by firing Donald before the twelve months. Therefore Donald can sue for compensatory damages which would be the amount of money that he would have made in the rest of the twelve months.

You might be interested in
Greenbelt Construction has been a successful small home-building firm for years. The owner pays subcontractors slightly more tha
kipiarov [429]

Answer: Option (E)

Explanation:

Supply chain management is referred to as or known as broad/wide range of activities which are required in order to control, plan, and execute a commodity's flow, i.e. from the primary stage of acquiring raw material and thus production to the final stage of distribution to consumer, in most streamlined, efficient and effective way that is possible.

In other words it encompasses or encloses integrated execution and planning of a procedure which is required in order to optimize flow of the material, financial capital and information in areas which include sourcing, demand planning, production, storage and inventory management, logistics and also the return of defective products.

4 0
3 years ago
You are a student at ABC University. You recently read in the school's daily newspaper about a terrific investment opportunity t
Vlada [557]

Answer:

No

Explanation:

An investment that "promises" a 44 percent annual return is most likely a scam, because even the riskiest stocks rarely yield annual returns higher than 10% of the initial investment.

Besides, the option is described as very complicated, and you as a potential investor do not understand it well, which is a very difficult position to be in because it could even lead you to being scammed without realizing.

4 0
3 years ago
Binder Corporation agreed to build a warehouse for a client at an agreed contract price of $4,000,000. Expected (and actual) cos
Rainbow [258]

Answer:

The correct option is a. 2017: $200,000 2018: $520,000 2019: $240,000.

Explanation:

The formula for cost to cost method is expected or actual cost incurred to date divided by the total cost of the project or contract.

Therefore, we have:

Total cost = Cost in 2017 + Cost in 2018 + Cost in 2019 = $640,000 + $1,600,000 + $800,000 = $3,040,000

Cost in 2017 contribution to total cost = Cost in 2017 / Total cost = $640,000 / $3,040,000 = 0.21

Cost in 2018 contribution to total cost = Cost in 2018 / Total cost = $1,600,000 / $3,040,000 = 0.53

Cost in 2019 contribution to total cost = Cost in 2019 / Total cost = $800,000 / $3,040,000 = 0.26

Revenue in 2017 = Cost in 2017 contribution to total cost * Contract price = 0.21 * $4,000,000 = $840,000

Revenue in 2018 = Cost in 2018 contribution to total cost * Contract price = 0.53 * $4,000,000 = $2,120,000

Revenue in 2019 = Cost in 2019 contribution to total cost * Contract price = 0.26 * $4,000,000 = $1,040,000

Therefore, net income for each year 2017 through 2019 using the cost-to-cost method can be computed as follows:

Net income for year 2017 = Revenue in 2017 - Cost in 2017 = $840,000 - $640,000 = $200,000

Net income for year 2018 = Revenue in 2018 - Cost in 2018 = $2,120,000 - $1,600,000 = $520,000

Net income for year 2019 = Revenue in 2019 - Cost in 2019 = $1,040,000 - $800,000 = $240,000

Therefore, the correct option is a. 2017: $200,000 2018: $520,000 2019: $240,000.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
"when a profit-maximizing firm in a competitive market has zero economic profit, accounting profit"
Nonamiya [84]
"when a profit-maximizing firm in a competitive market has zero economic profit, accounting profit"

The answer is positive.

8 0
3 years ago
What does pito mean kids said i look like a pito
Drupady [299]
In Spanish or in what


Cause if it’s in Spanish you don’t wanna know
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Linda Clark received $223,000 from her mother’s estate. She placed the funds into the hands of a broker, who purchased the follo
    11·2 answers
  • A congressional committee that holds a hearing to determine whether the department of agriculture is administering the food stam
    6·1 answer
  • Starbucks ceo howard schultz has made sure his employees have health insurance and work in a positive environment. he could best
    8·1 answer
  • In _____ innovation, innovations in products or services end up completely replacing existing products or service technologies.
    12·1 answer
  • If the revenue for a certain product is $9.00 each and the company sells x products, then the revenue equation is R = 9x. If the
    8·1 answer
  • The dollar interest received divided by the market price of the bond is called the:________.
    10·1 answer
  • A firm is considering changing their credit terms. It is estimated that this change would result in sales increasing by $1,600,0
    10·1 answer
  • What is the moving force of air
    7·1 answer
  • The Sausage Hut is looking at a new sausage system with an installed cost of $187,400. This cost will be depreciated straight-li
    10·1 answer
  • What must strategic leaders keep in mind if they are going to achieve successful strategic positioning
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!