1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tamiku [17]
3 years ago
9

A seller sold a house to a buyer allowing the buyer to take over the loan on a "subject to" basis. After 2 years, the buyer defa

ulted on the loan. Who would be liable to the lender for the note?
The Seller would be primarily liable
The Buyer would be primarily liable
Both buyer and seller would be primarily liable
Neither buyer or seller would be primarily liable
Business
1 answer:
lubasha [3.4K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

A. The seller would be primarily liable.

Explanation:

Subject to basis is a form of home buying options in real estate. It is a situation where the buyer takes over existing loan of a seller and make commitment to seller to continue repaying the loan to the lender.

Though the buyer will taken over the loan from the seller and make repayment to the lender, there is no legal obligation on buyer`s part that makes him/her liable to the lender. The seller still remain liable despite the the taking over. So  option A is right while B to D is wrong because it`s only the seller that is primarily liable to the lender.

You might be interested in
Safeway, publix, and other supermarket chains offers all types of foodstuffs as well as a variety of nontraditional goods and se
Vikki [24]
Diversifying.  It is so that they can tap into other markets.
8 0
3 years ago
An individual employed part-time at a retail store that schedules her based on the busiest times and days throughout the year, w
kykrilka [37]

Answer: contingent

                         

Explanation: It refers to the employment in which the job of an individual is not fixed with the company. In case of contingent employment, the employees are usually hired when there is a specific project to complete that needs extra work force.

Unlike seasonal employment the these employments are non recurring and there is no time fixed for employment that an individual could expect.

Thus, from the above we can conclude that the given case is an example of contingent employment.

8 0
3 years ago
On August 10,2019 ABC sells 16 mini trenchers to a farm co-op in western Minnesota. ABC provides a 4% volume discount on the min
cestrela7 [59]

Answer:

If it was likely or probable that the farm co-op would meet the benchmark and get the discount (or rebate), then the journal entry should recognize that. But since it is very doubtful that the benchmark will be met, then the journal entry should be made without considering any type of discount.  

I looked for a similar question in order to find the missing numbers:

each trencher is sold at $3,600 and costs $2,000

August 10, 2019, 16 mini trenchers sold to farm co-op

Dr Accounts receivable 57,600

    Cr Sales revenue 57,600

Dr Cost of goods sold 32,000

    Cr Inventory 32,000

5 0
3 years ago
Details of invoices for purchases of merchandise are as follows: Merchandise Freight Terms Returns and Allowances(a) $2,800 $45
Lostsunrise [7]

Answer:

A.$2,619

B.$6,800

C.$839

D.$495

Explanation:

Calculation to Determine the amount to be paid in full settlement of each of the invoices,

a) (2,800-200)*99%+45

=2,600*99%+45

=2,574+45

= $2,619

b) (7,600-800)

= $6,800

c)$1,400 – $600 – $16 + $55

=$784+$55

= $839

d)$500 –$5 = $495

6 0
3 years ago
Here are three things you could do if you do not attend your neighbor's barbecue: watch television with some friends (you value
Colt1911 [192]

Answer: Option (c) is correct.

Explanation:

Given that,

Alternatives for a person if he do not attend his neighbor's barbecue:

(1) Watch television with some friends = he value this at $17

(2) Read a good novel = he value this at $14

(3) Go in to work = he could earn $16 during the barbecue

Opportunity cost is the benefit that is foregone for an individual by choosing one alternative over other alternatives available to him.

If the opportunity cost is lower for an individual then this will benefit him whereas if the opportunity cost is higher then this will not benefit the individuals.

Therefore, the opportunity cost of going to his neighbor's barbecue is the enjoyment he get from watching television with some friends because this is the highest valued alternative forfeited.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Kayak Co. budgeted the following cash receipts (excluding cash receipts from loans received) and cash payments (excluding cash p
    15·1 answer
  • On Jan 1,2016, the Allegheny corporation purchased machinery for115,000$. The estimated service life of the machinery is 10 year
    5·1 answer
  • In the cell phone mini case, mobile power's money-back guarantee and warrantee are a form of ________ pricing
    10·1 answer
  • According to the law of comparative advantage, both individuals and nations will be able to produce a larger joint output if eac
    11·1 answer
  • In what year was the EEOC established<br> O<br> A. 1970<br> B. 1930<br> C. 2007<br> D. 1965
    6·1 answer
  • If an advertiser wants to enhance the sales of a specific good or service, institutional advertising should be used. Select one:
    8·1 answer
  • If fixed costs are $10,000 and variable costs are constant at $1.00 per unit over the relevant range of output, what will the av
    5·1 answer
  • Mr. Liu turns 65 on June 19. He has never previously qualified for Medicare so his first Medicare eligibility date will be by Ju
    13·1 answer
  • re-thinking oil: compensation for non-production in yasuní national park challenging sumak kawsay and degrowth
    15·1 answer
  • James was transferred by his company to go work in Hong Kong for six months. His headquarters in Dallas, Texas, assured him that
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!