Answer:
C) has no effect on Carr's earnings and profits for federal income tax purposes.
Explanation:
A stock dividend means that the corporation issues its existing shareholders more stock.
In essence, the corporation is merely diluting the proportional ownership interest of existing shares.
This has no effect on the corporation's earnings and profits for federal income tax purposes.
Therefore, the dividend has no effect on Carr's earnings and profits for federal income tax purposes.
After a car is purchased at $43000 and looses 25% worth every year then the car will be worth $9200 or less after four(4) years.
What does Purchase mean?
Purchase is a term used to refer to the acquisition of goods or services in exchange for money. It is a common business transaction and can involve buying something outright or entering into an agreement to pay for it over time.
What does Services mean?
Services is a broad term that refers to any type of work or activity performed to meet the needs of a customer. Services can range from professional services like accounting or consulting to tangible products like food or clothing. Services are typically intangible in the sense that they cannot be touched, felt, or seen, but the benefits they provide are very real.
As per the price of the car which is $43,000 and it looses 25% each year which is $10750. From this we come to know that the car will be worth of $9200 or less within 4 years.
To know more about Purchase,
brainly.com/question/27975123
#SPJ4
Answer:
$42.5 billion
Explanation:
the expected value formula = ∑ (valueₙ x probabilityₙ)
expected value = (low value x probability of low value) + (most likely value x probability of most likely value) + (high value x probability of high value)
= ($5 billion x 20%) + ($45 billion x 70%) + ($100 billion x 10%) = $1 billion + $31.5 billion + $10 billion = $42.5 billion
A=p(1+rt)
A=future value
P=present value
R=interest rate
T=time
If you want to find present value
P=A/(1+rt)
If you want to find interest rate
R=[(A/p)-1]divided by t
Finally if you want to find time
T=[(A/p)-1]divided by r
Answer:
No, their economic cost of enrolling in the business program is not the same for both,
Explanation:
The explicit costs of going back to college are the same for Walter and Jesse, e.g. they might be $20,000 per year, or even $30,000 doesn't matter for this analysis. But Walter is currently working as a teacher and that means taht if he decides to go to college, his implicit costs will include the forgone salary as a teacher which is $50,000 per year. Implicit costs are opportunity costs, i.e. additional costs or benefits lost from choosing one activity or investment instead of another alternative.
Since Jesse is not working, whether she goes back to college or not will not affect her income, it will still be $0, but if Walter goes back to college he will lose his salary.
