1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
hram777 [196]
4 years ago
8

 

History
1 answer:
kupik [55]4 years ago
8 0

D. Features vary from region to region.

You might be interested in
Why do you think rebellions were so prominent throughout colonial history?<br> .<br> I
ohaa [14]

American colonists had proven themselves experienced rebels. Whenever they felt their rights were jeopardized, they seemed willing to take up arms. Economic exploitation, lack of political representation, unfair taxation, were among the causes that led to these clashes.

i hope this answered your question <3

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Does the need for self-defense give the u.s. the right to interfere in the affairs of latin america?
Ira Lisetskai [31]
I believe it does not because self-defense is self-defense and it is right to do, but we don't have to "interfere" with other peoples stuff just because of self-defense.
7 0
4 years ago
With over eight million people, New York City is the most heavily populated city in the U.S. Between 1800 and 1900, the populati
a_sh-v [17]
B. finding jobs for everyone
4 0
4 years ago
The Constitution spells out_______ -those powers that belong to the federal government alone. What goes in the blank??
svlad2 [7]
<h2>"Expressed powers" or "enumerated powers."</h2>

Enumerated powers are those powers specifically granted to the federal government by the United States Constitution.

Enumerated powers include such things as the power to coin/print money, the power to establish and impose tariffs, and the power to regulated trade with foreign nations and trade/commerce between states.

Strict constructionists and loose constructionists differ over whether the government's powers should be limited to those specifically enumerated powers.  Strict constructionists read the Constitution as giving the federal government only those specifically delegated powers.  Loose constructionists argue that anything not specifically forbidden by the constitution can be within the window of what the government needs to do in adapting to the needs of time and circumstances. 

3 0
3 years ago
HELP ME! ASSIGNMENT DUE SOON. PLEASE WRITE ME A PARAGRAPH ON WHY YOU WOULD/ WOULDN'T WANT TO LIVE IN ENGLAND AT 1066. PAPER IS T
alexira [117]

Answer:

Explanation:

I wouldnt want to go to England even though it is a beautiful, I am happy where i live. well here is the answer..

The young monarch was unable to resist the invaders and was never crowned. William was crowned King William I of England on Christmas Day 1066, in Westminster Abbey, and is today known as William the Conqueror.

Very different from today - that's for sure. There were far fewer people living in England, and large parts of the country were covered by woods.

There were no castles and not many stone buildings. Some churches and monasterial buildings were fashioned from stone, but most of the houses - even grand ones - were made from timber.

There were some large-ish towns - London, York, Winchester, Southampton, Canterbury - but mainly people lived in villages or on farms. There was trade, but many villages were still self-sufficient, only relying on the traders for luxury items.

Families stuck together, especially if they farmed land.

All free-born men could be called on to go to war when their overlord needed them. They had to bring their own weapons - shield, axe, spear, sword and any armour they could afford. Anglo-Saxon warriors usually fought on foot in a shield wall. Horses were only used as transport to get to the battle.

Most people would not have been able to read or write. Noble children, and those whose family engaged in trade, were taught reading, writing, maths and Latin. Some Anglo-Saxon nobles also learnt Norman French and travelled to the courts of Normandy.

England had a very efficient government. The country was divided into Hundreds, a little like today's counties. Leaders of each Hundred formed a council and met regularly to discuss problems and issue fines for transgressions. There was one currency across all of England, and the king's officers collected taxes and kept records.

Compared to some other parts of Europe, England was a very well established, well-run, rich and prosperous country. No wonder William the Conqueror braved the English channel and a war to get his hands on it.

Hope this helps

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which is the best example of how the Constitution made the federal government stronger in dealing with other countries?
    8·2 answers
  • 1. Mark each statement if it describes geographic and climatic features of Scandinavia that encouraged people to go to sea.
    14·2 answers
  • How did northerners respond to the Fugitive Slave Act?
    5·1 answer
  • Why did James Monroe and Robert Livingston act quickly to buy the Louisiana Territory?
    11·2 answers
  • What is the significance of the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut?
    11·2 answers
  • Why are freedom of speech and press important parts of democratic government
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a benefit of having selectmen in a town or village?
    10·2 answers
  • How did the Santa Fe trail start
    8·1 answer
  • Countries settling in America included all the following except:
    9·1 answer
  • which state was the first to set the notion that a state had the right to nullify federal laws and secede from the north
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!