To support any claim, we need evidence that is in favor. And they are the arguments and explanations that best supports the claim. And those which does not supports the claim, leave the claim uncertain. And different debates will have a different list of evidence and reasons which support, and also a list that does not support the claim. Hence, first find the issue, which is the claim, and then find out what supports and what does not support the claim. And then you can put your words forward. That is the correct way to participate in a healthy debate. Remember, you should either support the claim, or you should be against the claim. And you will have to stick to it till the very end, supporting it with your thoughts and evidence that you can collect while preparing for the debate. The better you prepare, the healthier it is going to be the debate. And you should never be 50-50. You should either agree or disagree. Like if you are debating on climate change, you can either support it or not support it. The bushfire in Australia is a fact that supports, and you can pick it up if you are supporting, and economic loss is a fact that does not support it. You can pick that fact if you do not support it. The point is, you should put forward strong facts, And that makes a debate healthier.
<h3> FIRSTLY Is to remove poverty from society. ... majority of population live in poverty so if poverty is removed then they become manpower of the nation as well as of the society which speed up to the development of process.</h3>
The Europeans brought many diseases that killed off the tribe and eventually led to the tribe decreasing greatly. The Europeans took over their land and enslaved/killed a lot of them. The Europeans overall forced them off of their land or they killed/enslaved them.
while development activity there is a threat to industry because when there is development there is chance of establishing other industries which directly affects other industries
