<u>Answer:</u>
<em>B. Chamberlain and Nehru both appeal to the economic interests of their audience, but Chamberlain is appealing to a desire for power, while Nehru is appealing to a sense of social justice.</em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
From the above passage it is evident that Chamberlain has failed to comprehend a united India, while on the other hand Nehru is more focused on delivering social justice to each and everyone. It is evident that Chamberlain has a pessimistic tone about the entire concept of “unity in diversity”. He believed that it was a utopian idea to unite a nation that’s so diverse and in pieces. On the other hand Nehru believed in this very utopian idea of one nation.
Um... do you have a link? to this question, because I don't see anything.
One of the reasons why upper-class Latin Americans favored governments run by caudillos (military leaders) is because their strict rule often came with economic incentives for the rich.
Answer:
Ghana's independence achieved in 1957. On August 3, 1956, the new assembly passed a motion authorizing the government to request independence within the British Commonwealth. ... Dominion status would continue until 1960, when after a national referendum, Ghana was declared a republic.
Explanation:
<span>As the title stated: Anti Semitism. Denouncing anything jewish as bad. making jews the source of anything evil in the world and the reason for suffering of any kind.</span>
