The answer is spread of innovations, cultural blending, an damage to some cultures
Answer:
b. Revulsion alone at someone else's action is not sufficient evidence that it is harmful or immoral.
Explanation:
Hello! A type of food does not become immoral for someone's tastes, even if it disgusts you and you personally choose not to eat it because it’s not your type of dish, it is not an opinion that transforms food directly into something prohibited or charged with negative connotation, since it is something subjective that does not influence a culture.
Answer:
cognitive
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that Cheryl’s verbal proficiency demonstrates a cognitive difference between the sexes. In the context of psychology, cognitive refers to an individuals ability to learn, understand and interpret information. This seems to be the main difference in this scenario since Cheryl is apparently able to understand and interpret information faster than the men in her life, so she uses it to her advantage to talk her way out of situations.
It spreaded from Korea,China,Japan Because if you have a book of history about Buddhism you can find your answers i also took this test Hope This Helps:)