Answer:
well-structured problem is the answer.
Explanation:
The answer is: <span>players will over invest in performance enhancements.
judging performance relative to other will create a situation where all players would have to watch over each other and keep improving to maintain a comfortable led with their competitors. In this situation, overly investing in performance enhancement would seem like the most reasonable decision for the players</span>
The statement that is untrue about tundra biome is that it support much plant life.
<h3>What is a tundra biome?</h3>
This part of ecosystem is characterized by an extreme cold temperatures, treeless and frozen landscapes.
Hence, the statement that is untrue about tundra biome is that it support much plant life because the harsh condition does not allow proper plant growth.
Therefore, the Option A is correct.
Read more about tundra biome
<em>brainly.com/question/7640891</em>
#SPJ1
Answer: the correct anwer is A. A suit seeking to assert the interest of state citizens in retaining diplomatic relations with a foreign nation.
Explanation:
Under the Article III, section 2, the United States Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and in which the state is a party. In option A, the state is trying to act in parents patriae which is to act as representative of its citizens thereby asserting their interests that is to say that the state is not a party in the case. In all other case the state is a party and has incumbency in the matter.
The entire situation with the colonies revolting from British control wouldn't have happened without the Seven Years War (of which the section happening in the North American colonies is called the "French and Indian War").
The British only raised taxes, which is the thing that first upset the American Colonies, to pay down the debt from fighting that war.
The British wouldn't have been considering allowing the Catholic settlers from Canada to move into the Ohio Valley and to keep those from the American Colonies out if they hadn't won the war, since Canada would still have been French.
The American colonists would have had less grievances with the British for the way that the leadership of the British armies messed up in the Colonies if the war hadn't happened.
The American colonists wouldn't have had as many experienced combatants and leaders (Washington being a huge one that learned his skill in war fighting for the British) without the earlier war taking place.
