1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
JulsSmile [24]
4 years ago
7

Select the correct answer.

English
2 answers:
grigory [225]4 years ago
4 0

Answer: The right answer is the B) The short story describes the mental state of each character better than the play.

Explanation: Just to elaborate a little on the answer, it can be added that the narrative in the excerpt from the play is very brief and objective, so option A can be discarded. In addition, it does not reveal any trait or opinion from the characters, so option D can also be discarded. Furthermore, the play does not explain how the characters were, so option C should be discarded as well. It is the short story, “A Jury of Her Peers,” the one that describes the mental state of each character in a more precise way. The County Attorney is trying to be understanding and patient, Mr. Hale seems dubious and intimated, and Mrs. Hale is concerned about her husband and about the testimony that he is about to provide.      

Crazy boy [7]4 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Explanation:

Answer: B

You might be interested in
02.03Read the following passage from "What Does American Democracy Mean to Me" by Mary McLeod Bethune and the paraphrase that fo
Arturiano [62]

We can actually deduce here that the above is not a good paraphrase of Mary McLeod Bethune's passage because: D: It's the writer's own version of the text.

<h3>What is paraphrasing?</h3>

Paraphrasing is actually known to be a process of restating a block of text, passage or paragraph in one's own words without altering the message in the original material.

Summary is also seen as an example of paraphrasing.

It should be noted that whenever one is paraphrasing, it is very important to retain the main points stated in the original. If the main points are not retained, then the writer has written his own version.

Thus, we see that the selected answer above is not a good paraphrase of Mary McLeod Bethune's passage.

Learn more paraphrase on brainly.com/question/24729251

#SPJ1

4 0
2 years ago
What was the main flaw in the sepreme courts reasoning in Plessy v. Ferguson
devlian [24]
N Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), the Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of a Louisiana law passed in 1890 "providing for separate railway carriages for the white and colored races." The law, which required that all passenger railways provide separate cars for blacks and whites, stipulated that the cars be equal in facilities, banned whites from sitting in black cars and blacks in white cars (with exception to "nurses attending children of the other race"), and penalized passengers or railway employees for violating its terms. 

<span>Homer Plessy, the plaintiff in the case, was seven-eighths white and one-eighth black, and had the appearance of a white man. On June 7, 1892, he purchased a first-class ticket for a trip between New Orleans and Covington, La., and took possession of a vacant seat in a white-only car. Duly arrested and imprisoned, Plessy was brought to trial in a New Orleans court and convicted of violating the 1890 law. He then filed a petition against the judge in that trial, Hon. John H. Ferguson, at the Louisiana Supreme Court, arguing that the segregation law violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which forbids states from denying "to any person within their jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws," as well as the Thirteenth Amendment, which banned slavery. </span>

<span>The Court ruled that, while the object of the Fourteenth Amendment was to create "absolute equality of the two races before the law," such equality extended only so far as political and civil rights (e.g., voting and serving on juries), not "social rights" (e.g., sitting in a railway car one chooses). As Justice Henry Brown's opinion put it, "if one race be inferior to the other socially, the constitution of the United States cannot put them upon the same plane." Furthermore, the Court held that the Thirteenth Amendment applied only to the imposition of slavery itself. </span>

<span>The Court expressly rejected Plessy's arguments that the law stigmatized blacks "with a badge of inferiority," pointing out that both blacks and whites were given equal facilities under the law and were equally punished for violating the law. "We consider the underlying fallacy of [Plessy's] argument" contended the Court, "to consist in the assumption that the enforced separation of the two races stamps the colored race with a badge of inferiority. If this be so, it is not by reason of anything found in the act, but solely because the colored race chooses to put that construction upon it." </span>

<span>Justice John Marshall Harlan entered a powerful -- and lone -- dissent, noting that "in view of the Constitution, in the eye of the law, there is in this country no superior, dominant, ruling class of citizens. There is no caste here. Our Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens." </span>

<span>Until the mid-twentieth century, Plessy v. Ferguson gave a "constitutional nod" to racial segregation in public places, foreclosing legal challenges against increasingly-segregated institutions throughout the South. The railcars in Plessy notwithstanding, the black facilities in these institutions were decidedly inferior to white ones, creating a kind of racial caste society. However, in the landmark decision Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the "separate but equal" doctrine was abruptly overturned when a unanimous Supreme Court ruled that segregating children by race in public schools was "inherently unequal" and violated the Fourteenth Amendment. Brown provided a major catalyst for the civil rights movement (1955-68), which won social, not just political and civil, racial equality before the law. After four decades, Justice Harlan's dissent became the law of the land. Following Brown, the Supreme Court has consistently ruled racial segregation in public settings to be unconstitutional. </span>
8 0
3 years ago
Which sentence uses correct end punctuation? Why do some mountain trees only have leaves and branches on one side. Unexpected sn
garik1379 [7]

Answer:

Winter air is cold and dry in the Rocky Mountains

Explanation:

It's The last one because you can see in the first one that it is a question but has a period. The second one is a statement and it has a question mark. The third one doesn't sound like it would sound exciting

4 0
3 years ago
Reread lines 520-523.
Margaret [11]

Answer:

If Rainsford is panicking, he is probably not being mindful of the likely easy-to-follow) trail he's leaving  behind .

Explanation:

Richard Connell's short story <em>The Most Dangerous Game</em> presents a famed and expert hunter being hunted by an insane and barbaric general who prides himself in achieving an exciting form of hunting. Sanger Rainsford's attempts to save himself from the grasp of the insane hunter General Zaroff led to the inverse role of him being hunted despite being a talented hunter himself.

The given lines are from after General Zaroff told him to get along before he is pursued as a prey. Rainsford had to get to a safe distance if he is to stay alive and earn his freedom. And in his shock in discovering he had been selected as the prey to be hunted, he couldn't think straight which led him to have a sort of<em> "panic"</em>. So, the <em>"plunging along"</em> in panic in the sentence can be problematic for if he panics, then it will mean he will not have a clear mind on how to misdirect his hunter. The <u>panic will most likely keep him so occupied that he will miss making the trail difficult, leading Zaroff to follow the easy trail left behind by the 'panicking' Rainsford.</u>  

8 0
3 years ago
8. What style of discipline promotes choice and allows children to have responsibility for their decisions? A. Overpermissive B.
Gemiola [76]
The answer is C. Authoritarian means <span>favoring/enforcing strict obedience to authority</span>.
4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which words does the narrator use to describe the mood of Roderick’s room? Check the three best choices.
    13·2 answers
  • You obviously can organize a meeting agenda well;therefore are you able to keep order at a meeting with many loud-spoken,argumen
    13·1 answer
  • In which sentence is the underlined infinitive or infinitive phrase functioning as a direct object?
    14·2 answers
  • Say "I can" or say "I can't" and your right either way
    9·2 answers
  • Which text would a reader choose for the purpose of discovering opinions on healthy eating?
    11·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP!!!! can you fill in the blanks so it will make sense??
    10·1 answer
  • Now i really dont want to talk to him because he from a place my sister got killed at....
    15·1 answer
  • How is "This Is America" a protest song?
    6·2 answers
  • What is the counterclaim in this paragraph?
    10·2 answers
  • study carefully each of advertisement below identify the propaganda technique used encircle the word/s that you used as clues to
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!