Answer:
Weak because of proximate cause is difficult to prove in absence of other similarly affected individuals
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that the 60 year old man have a lung cancer so he sues the asbestos manufacturer also he trust that it is unsafe as her friend who use the alternative material has not have a lung cancer so here the case would be weak as of proximate cause as it is difficult for proving it
Therefore the same is to be considered
Insurance can definitely help you in case of an emergency.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
utilitarian perspective
Explanation:
In simple words, utilitarian approach refers to a method for making decisions in case of ethical dilemmas. Under this approach, the decision making authority makes judgement by focusing on the greater good, that is, making judgement that benefits the most of the individuals and harm the least.
This theory states that every party's interest should be taken into consideration equally as every related individual to the judgement is capable of suffering . However this approach is used when it is not possible to benefit all the stakeholders equally.
The government can require licenses in order to start the small business. This keeps the small business accountable and the government and keep track of this.
Answer:
a concept that explains how a customer’s choices affect which products a business should continue to supply in the market
Explanation:
In simple words, Dollar voting relates to the example used only to relate to the effect of consumer demand on the behavior of suppliers via the stream of consumer purchases for their commodities to the suppliers.
In the potential, goods which people purchase will continue to be made. Throughout the future, product lines which are not selling as well as anticipated will probably have fewer productive assets. Efficiently, customers vote for "finalists" as well as "whiners" with their transactions as per this metaphor.
