The Antifederalists opposed the ratification of the
Constitution because the New Constitution didn't have a bill of rights that
would guarantee basic freedoms. That is letter C.
<span>Federalists agree to the
constitution and believe that a strong central government is needed for the
preservation of the union. They focused and criticized the flaws of Articles of
Confederation and view their rivals as having no solutions. The leaders in this
government are strong and well organized. Anti-Federalists on the other hand,
agree to the weak federal government and fully supported the bill of rights;
they further argued that the constitution being proposed by the federalists
contain no protection of the rights of the individual. They are skeptical on
the constitution as it is being influenced by the colonialism</span>
Abolitionists were angered by the Dred Scott decision, which they considered a method for the Supreme Court to put an end to the debate about slavery in the territories Hence option B
<h3>
What was Dred Scott's Decision?</h3>
The Dred Scott decision was a March 6, 1857 opinion by the United States Supreme Court that being in a free state or territory did not entitle an enslaved individual, Dred Scott, to his freedom. Scott, being someone's property, was not a citizen, and hence could not sue in federal court, according to the verdict.
So, in the aforementioned facts, northerners were disappointed with the Dred Scott verdicts since they said that slavery would become legal everywhere.
Learn more about Dred's decisions:
brainly.com/question/23987166
#SPJ1
It could be said that because of the deteriorating conditions, Penn decided to emigrate. So in 1677, a group of Quakers (with Penn) purchased the colonial province of West Jersey (today known as New Jersey). He was planning to extend Quakers´region. He became the proprietor of a big track of land and gained sovereignty over the territory. <span />
It might be four, because all three of them are apart of the axis powers.
