Hey there!
Here is your answer:
<u><em>The proper answer to this question is "Miranda v. Arizona".</em></u>
Reason:
<u><em>Miranda rights were giving in the case Miranda v. Arizona. Miranda rights were given because a man was arrested and didnt have any rights because he was to poor to have a attorney.</em></u>
<em>Therefore the answer is Miranda v. Arizona!</em>
If you need anymore help feel free to ask me!
Hope this helps!
~Nonportrit
The answer is A. They didn’t want tariffs, did need slaves and used slaves in farms
Political, economic social causes of the French Revolution
All three are ways of approaching the economic system and how much the government should be involved in that system.
Capitalism involves private ownership of businesses with little to no government interference or regulation. Most countries do not run on laissez-faire capitalism in which there is no gov't regulation. However more run as a blend between capitalism and socialism.
In socialism, the government owns the means of production and sets pricing, wages, quotas, and production. Often managers are government appointed and the workers all receive an equal wage for their work. Cooperation is key to the success of socialism. This is also the step between an overthrow of capitalism to full communism.
In communism, the means of production are owned by the people and the gov't is no longer needed to regulate business and/or wages. It is a complete cooperative state where the workers work for the good of all.
