Answer: It should be 1/2, 50% or 0.5
Step-by-step explanation: There are only two different things you can get when flipping the coin, so it would be 1/2
Answer: . To prove triangles are similar, you need to prove two pairs of corresponding angles are congruent
Step-by-step explanation:
SSS similarity postulate
The SSS similarity postulate says that if the lengths of the corresponding sides of two triangles are proportional then the triangles must be similar.
In the given figure , we have two triangles ΔABC and ΔXYZ such that the corresponding sides of both the triangles are proportional.
i.e.
Then by SSS-similarity criteria , we have
ΔABC ≈ ΔXYZ
BRAINLIEST PLEASE????
Answer:
96
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Now we can calculate the p value. Since is a bilateral test the p value would be:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/230d6/230d6156e0e2bdff2d00a753d91bfa97c95f51ba" alt="p_v= P(Z>2) =0.0228"
Since the p value is lower than the significance level of 0.05 we have enough evidence to conclude that the true proportion of residents favored annexation is higher than 0.72 or 72%
Step-by-step explanation:
Information given
n=900 represent the random sample selected
estimated proportion of residents favored annexation
is the value that we want to test
represent the significance level
z would represent the statistic
represent the p value
Hypothesis to test
The political strategist wants to test the claim that the percentage of residents who favor annexation is above 72%.:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
The statistic for this case is given by:
(1)
Replacing the data given we got:
Now we can calculate the p value. Since is a bilateral test the p value would be:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/230d6/230d6156e0e2bdff2d00a753d91bfa97c95f51ba" alt="p_v= P(Z>2) =0.0228"
Since the p value is lower than the significance level of 0.05 we have enough evidence to conclude that the true proportion of residents favored annexation is higher than 0.72 or 72%
The triangle is illustrated below.
<h3>How to explain the triangle?</h3>
The first thing you should find are the new vertices:
(x, y) ---> (2x, 2y) ---> (x', y')
(0, 0) ---> (2 (0), 2 (0)) ---> (0, 0)
(-4, 4) ---> (2 (-4), 2 (4)) ---> (-8, 8)
(-4, -2) ---> (2 (-4), 2 (-2)) ---> (-8, -4)
Then, you must join the ordered pairs and graph the new triangle.
See the attached graph.
Learn more about triangles on:
brainly.com/question/1058720
#SPJ1