1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ivenika [448]
3 years ago
7

Joel chandler harris won the blank in journalism for exposing the klan’s violence and naming the members who were also public of

ficials
History
2 answers:
pogonyaev3 years ago
6 0

Julian Harris won the PULITZER in journalism for exposing the Klan’s violence and naming the members who were also public officials.

In 1926, Julian LaRose Harris won a Pulitzer Prize along with his wife Julia Collier Harris for his "energetic struggle" against the Ku Klux Klan.

AlladinOne [14]3 years ago
5 0

PULITIZER just did the assignment.

You might be interested in
Explain popular sovernty
astraxan [27]

Popular sovereignty, or sovereignty of the peoples' rule, is the principle that the authority of a state and its government are created and sustained by the consent of its people, through their elected representatives (Rule by the People), who is the source of all political power.

5 0
4 years ago
Who makes the better argument
frutty [35]
The person with better evidence and reasoning
7 0
3 years ago
The 1453 conquest of Constantinople is an important turning point in global history because it (1) ushered in Pax Romana (2) beg
Montano1993 [528]
It contributed to the rise of the Ottoman Empire. When the Byzantine Empire ended, the Ottomans received a strong trade port affecting Mediterranean-black sea trade zones.<span />
8 0
3 years ago
If the Confederacy had made a plan similar to the Anaconda Plan, which of the following would not be included?
MAVERICK [17]
If the Confederacy had made a plan similar to the Anaconda Plan, the capturing of Washington D.C. and controlling California. The only event that will not happen if the Confederacy made the same Anaconda plan would be blockading Boston and New York. The answer is the third statement.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
"In the late 1800s and early 1900s the federal government supported the efforts of the labor movement."
Katena32 [7]

Answer:

The Pullman Strike and Loewe Vs Lawlor

Explanation:

The Pullman Strike was an organised strike by the American Railway Union against the Pullman Company. The strike closed off many of the nations railroad traffic. Workers of the Pullman company had gone on strike in response to a reduction in wages and when this was unsuccessful, they increased their efforts and with the help of the AFU took it nationwide. They refused to couple or move any train that carried a Pullman car. At its peak the strike included  250,000 workers in 27 states.The federal government's response was to obtain an injunction against the union and to order them to stop interfering with trains. When they refused, President Cleveland sent in the army to stop strikers from interfering with the trains. Violence broke out and the strike collapsed. The leaders were sentenced to prison and the ARU dissolved.

Loewe V Lawlor was a Supreme Court decision that went against the rights of the labour movement. D. E. Loewe & Company had been subjected to a strike and a boycott as a result of it becoming an 'open shop'. The nationwide boycott was supported by the American Federation of Labor and persuaded retailers, wholesalers and customers not to buy from Loewe. This boycott cost him a large amount of money and he sued the union for violating the Sherman Antitrust Act (Another piece of legislation subsequently used to attack unions).

The case was sent to the US Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut, which found that the lawsuit was out of the scope of the Sherman Act. However, upon appeal it then went to the Supreme Court, who ruled in favour of Loewe. The courts decision was important for two reasons. Firstly it allowed individual unionists to be held personally responsible for damages arising from the activities of their unions. Secondly, it effectively outlawed secondary boycott (Where members of different companies boycott in solidarity with the affected workers) as a violation of the Sherman Act. Both of these limited the ability of the unions to bring about change through striking and boycott.

Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/13463190#readmore

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why does the legislature branch of the government represent the people most directly
    14·1 answer
  • Founded by Osama bin Laden, which was considered the most dangerous international terrorist group in the 1990s and early 2000s?
    5·2 answers
  • The Warren Court’s decision about prayer in public schools outlawed all forms of prayer in public schools. silent prayers by ind
    14·2 answers
  • Does anyone know how to do this I'm stumped
    5·1 answer
  • Plz Help ASAP
    14·2 answers
  • visual sources should be used within the discussion to reinforce and explain the written information​
    10·1 answer
  • WILL MARK BRAILIEST1!!!!!!
    5·1 answer
  • )<br> 2. Who won the French and Indian War? *
    7·1 answer
  • The English bill of rights established a
    12·2 answers
  • There was much debate over the ratification of the Constitution. Choose either the Federalist or anti-Federalist position and ar
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!