There are no options listed but from apex the correct answer is all of the above
Answer:
the major difference between the way that the Spanish and French treated "their" Indians was based on the respective economic and societal needs to the two European nations.... By contrast, the Spanish used the Indians economically and integrated them into the colonial society.
(according to Google)
Mostly they affected it through their imperialism. They would colonize and take over countries for resources, and with them they would bring their technologies and things that they needed. After they left these things stayed, things like telephone and telegram lines and similar things. Culturally, they would mostly disregard the local culture and impose their own which would often be accepted and kept by the locals, but often there was also warfare.
Answer:
Yes it was
Explanation:
The Constitution gave the federal government the power to put down domestic rebellions, including slave insurrections.
The framers of the Constitution believed that concessions on slavery were the price for the support of southern delegates for a strong central government.
The Constitution protected slavery by increasing political representation for slave owners and slave states
They were limiting, stringently though temporarily, congressional power to regulate the international slave trade and by protecting the rights of slave owners to recapture their escaped slaves.
