All categories

3 years ago

Help

Mathematics

2 answers:

igomit [66]3 years ago

8 0

3(d + 11) = 6(d + 33)

So you have: 3d + 33 = 6d + 198

which is: -3d = 165

or d = -55

So you have <em>only one answer.</em>

Xelga [282]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanationn:

You might be interested in

Jose invested $5000 into a fund with an interest rate of 4.8%.

Minchanka [31]

$5000 × 0.048×2= $480

Answer: $480

3 0

3 years ago

Will mark brainliest

vovikov84 [41]

(0,0)-->(0,0)
(3,-1)-->(9,-3)
(3,3)-->(9,9)

so what you will plug after the dilation will be the points on the right/
hope i help

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following equations describes the line shown below? Check all<br> that apply.

scoundrel [369]

Answer:

B. y = 2x - 2

E. $y + 4 = 2(x + 1)$

F. $y - 6 = 2(x - 4)$

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation of the line can be found using either the point-slope equation or the slope-intercept equation.

✔️Equation of the line in point-slope using the slope and the coordinates of the point (4, 6):

Slope = m = change in y/change in x

Using (4, 6) and (-1, -4),

m = (-4 - 6)/(-1 - 4)

m = -10/-5

m = 2

Substitute m = 2, and (a, b) = (4, 6) into the point-slope equation form $y - b = m(x - a)$

Thus:

$y - 6 = 2(x - 4)$

✔️Equation of the line in point-slope using the slope and the coordinates of the point (-1, -4):

Slope = m = 2

Substitute m = 2, and (a, b) = (-1, -4) into the point-slope equation form $y - b = m(x - a)$

Thus:

$y - (-4) = 2(x - (-1))$

$y + 4 = 2(x + 1)$

✔️Equation of the line in slope-intercept form, y = mx + b

Where,

m = slope = 2

b = y-intercept = -2 (the point where the line intercepts the y-axis)

Thus, substitute m = 2 and b = -2 into y = mx + b

y = 2x + (-2)

y = 2x - 2

6 0

3 years ago

Jason deposited $18 000 in a bank that offers an interest rate of 5% per annum compounded

8_murik_8 [283]

Answer:

$1995.97.

Step-by-step explanation:

Amount in bank after 20 days =

18000(1 + 0.05/365)^20

= $18049.38

So H = 18049.38 - 16093.41

= $1995.97.

3 0

2 years ago

A recent study found that 51 children who watched a commercial for Walker Crisps (potato chips) featuring a long-standing sports

hichkok12 [17]

Answer:

The claim is that the mean amount of Walker Crisps eaten was significantly higher for the children who watched the sports celebrity- endorsed Walker Crisps commercial

The kind of test to use is a t -test because a t -test is used to check if there is a difference between means of a population

$t = 3.054$

The p-value is $p-value = P(Z > 3.054) = 0.0011291$

The conclusion is

There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean amount of Walker Crisps eaten was significantly higher for the children who watched the sports celebrity- endorsed Walker Crisps commercial

The test statistics is

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

The first sample size is $n_1 = 51$

The first sample mean is $\mu_1 = 36$

The second sample size is $n_2 = 41$

The second sample size is $\mu_2 = 25$

The first standard deviation is $\sigma _1 = 21.4 \ g$

The second standard deviation is $\sigma _2 = 12.8 \ g$

The level of significance is $\alpha = 0.05$

The null hypothesis is $H_o : \mu_1 = \mu_ 2$

The alternative hypothesis is $H_a : \mu_1 > \mu_2$

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

$t = \frac{\= x_1 - \= x_2}{ \sqrt{ \frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2} } }$

=> $t = \frac{ 36 - 25}{ \sqrt{ \frac{ 21.4^2}{51} + \frac{ 12.8^2}{41} } }$

=> $t = 3.054$

The p-value is mathematically represented as

$p-value = P(Z > 3.054)$

Generally from the z table

$P(Z > 3.054) = 0.0011291$

=> $p-value = P(Z > 3.054) = 0.0011291$

From the values obtained we see that $p-value < \alpha$ so the null hypothesis is rejected

Thus the conclusion is

There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean amount of Walker Crisps eaten was significantly higher for the children who watched the sports celebrity- endorsed Walker Crisps commercial

5 0

3 years ago