The purpose of the IX Amendment was to claim the precept that the enumerated rights aren't exhaustive and very last and that the listing of certain rights does now no longer deny or disparage the life of different rights.
<h3>What do you know about Amendment IX?</h3>
No Title of Nobility will be granted with the aid of using the United States: And no Person preserving any Office of Profit or Trust below them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, take delivery of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any type whatever, from any King, Prince, or overseas State.
The rights included with the aid of using the Ninth Amendment aren't specified, they're mentioned as “unenumerated".
Therefore, The purpose of the IX Amendment was to claim the precept that the enumerated rights aren't exhaustive and very last and that the listing of certain rights does now no longer deny or disparage the life of different rights.
Learn more about IX Amendment here:
brainly.com/question/796033
#SPJ1
1. Produce cotton, woolens, and various types of fabric
2. 12-14 hours every day, and half on Saturday
3. They were able to help provide for their familie’s mortgages/help their families altogether
4. The girls used their money to help provide for their family
5. Read books
Answer:
Another possible explanations for Jorge's finding is that <u>the wind vane on the rooftop of the opposite building might be faulty.</u>
This is because, a faulty wind vane would not be able to give a correct reading (direction of the wind ) hence the reason why the wind vane is rotating in different directions.
Explanation:
The answer is "<span>external locus of control".
</span>
Locus of control refers to a psychological idea that alludes to how firmly individuals trust they have control over the circumstances and encounters that influence their lives.Students with an "external locus of control" by and large trust that their victories or disappointments result from outer factors outside their ability to control, for example, good fortune, destiny, condition, foul play, predisposition, or instructors who are uncalled for, partial, or untalented.
Answer:
Glendale was not able to prove that the ordinance directly advanced the claim of interest in public safety.
Explanation:
Pagan v. Fruchey and Village of Glendale is a case in which Christopher Pagan wanted to sell his car and put a for sale sign on it and parked it on a city street. Because of this, he received a notice that his car was in violation of a city ordinance that didn't allow him to do this. He filed a suit claiming that the law was unconstitutional because it violated his First Amendment right. Pagan won because Glendale couldn't provide enough evidence that the ordinance had the goal of avoiding a potential harm. It was considered that the law didn't serve a government interest in public safety.
