1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
murzikaleks [220]
3 years ago
12

The only shadow of an argument, that can be brought to support the repeal of the Stamp Act, is that our trade with that country

will suffer, if we enforce the tax with spirit and rigour. I grant it will—but what then? It will suffer only for a time; and this necessary severity will support and secure it for the future. Whereas if the tax is repealed, it will give a blow to our trade, that will be felt for ages—it will open a channel to the Americans for a free commerce with all the world: The manufactures of this country will be rejected, in proportion as other nations underwork, and undersell us: In short, America will be no longer British, but German, French, Spanish, Russian—and what not? Forbid it Heaven, that I should live to see the day, when a country, which has cost us so much blood and treasure to defend, will be made the bubble of popularity, or the plaything of power; liable to be blown away by vanity on one hand, or lost, by childish weakness and timidity, on the other.
...
The Americans imbibe notions of independence and liberty with their very milk, and will some time or other shake off all subjection. If we yield to them in this particular, by repealing the Stamp-Act, it is all over; they will from that moment assert their freedom. Whereas if we enforce the Act, we may keep them in dependence for some years longer: they are not yet in a condition to resist us—they cannot live without our manufactories ...

• Does the statement support or build on a point in any of the other documents?
• Does it argue the other side of any of those points?
• Does this passage tell you something important about the author's point of view?
• How do you feel about the argument made in this passage? Do you agree? Disagree? Have
mixed feelings?
• Is it a primary or secondary source?
• What is the purpose of the document?
• What is the viewpoint of the author?
• Is there bias in the document?
History
1 answer:
Gelneren [198K]3 years ago
4 0
To my knowledge the medulla oblongata is yet impartial to the reproductive organs of the higgins and should be considered in the result of this action. 

so using this and the consideration of the format of this question the correct answer is \lim_{n \to \infty} a_n   \left[\begin{array}{ccc}1&2&3\\4&5&6\\7&8&9\end{array}\right]  x^{2}  \left \{ {{y=2} \atop {x=2}} \right.  \sqrt[n]{x}  \sqrt{x}  x^{123}  x_{123}  \beta  \beta which in Klingon spells C.
You might be interested in
Why does God make people with disabilities why doesn't he give people the same chances at life
Stolb23 [73]
Maybe because he wants the people with disabilities to become stronger human beings and often times they are the happiest people you meet, possibly it's to prove to people without disabilities that these people are a lot stronger and you should learn to live your life as happy as they do.
5 0
3 years ago
Why do you think poets are often invited to speak at presidential inaugurations .??
kompoz [17]

Answer:

Poets are invited to presidential inaugurations because they have an unique ability to elicit emotions and inspire with words.

Poets are talented individuals who know how to use language in artistic ways much better than a president or any other politician, so it naturally makes sense that a president enjoys the the presence of a poet in his or her inauguration, it could even help the inaugurated president raise his popularity levels.

6 0
3 years ago
During Jefferson's term in office, the power of the Supreme Court was increased.​
hammer [34]

Answer:

might b true

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Some of the most important documents handed down to us from the past are
stira [4]
The declaration of independence
4 0
3 years ago
Why might you segregate children according to age?
Step2247 [10]

Answer:

Children mostly segregate from adults, showing less adult interaction as they move into their teenage and young adult years.

Explanation:

hope this helps and feel free to add brainiest

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did President Polk and the British settle their differences regarding the Oregon Country? They compromised on the border loc
    5·2 answers
  • What are ways political parties attempt to shape public policy ?
    7·1 answer
  • Which historical figure played a major role in the abolition of slavery in British empire ?
    15·2 answers
  • Help me please I’ll mark brainliest
    8·1 answer
  • It's difficult to take a case to the supreme court because:
    12·1 answer
  • Who inspired hip hop
    12·1 answer
  • What are the possible benefits and drawbacks of voting via the internet
    7·2 answers
  • 13. The eastern strip that Germany lost to Poland was referred to as the "Polish Corridor." Poland
    13·2 answers
  • Which is a difference between a mature fern and a heart-shaped plant?
    9·1 answer
  • Why did the United States invade Afghanistan in 2001? The US wanted to restore order to Afghanistan after the president was kill
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!