1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
murzikaleks [220]
3 years ago
12

The only shadow of an argument, that can be brought to support the repeal of the Stamp Act, is that our trade with that country

will suffer, if we enforce the tax with spirit and rigour. I grant it will—but what then? It will suffer only for a time; and this necessary severity will support and secure it for the future. Whereas if the tax is repealed, it will give a blow to our trade, that will be felt for ages—it will open a channel to the Americans for a free commerce with all the world: The manufactures of this country will be rejected, in proportion as other nations underwork, and undersell us: In short, America will be no longer British, but German, French, Spanish, Russian—and what not? Forbid it Heaven, that I should live to see the day, when a country, which has cost us so much blood and treasure to defend, will be made the bubble of popularity, or the plaything of power; liable to be blown away by vanity on one hand, or lost, by childish weakness and timidity, on the other.
...
The Americans imbibe notions of independence and liberty with their very milk, and will some time or other shake off all subjection. If we yield to them in this particular, by repealing the Stamp-Act, it is all over; they will from that moment assert their freedom. Whereas if we enforce the Act, we may keep them in dependence for some years longer: they are not yet in a condition to resist us—they cannot live without our manufactories ...

• Does the statement support or build on a point in any of the other documents?
• Does it argue the other side of any of those points?
• Does this passage tell you something important about the author's point of view?
• How do you feel about the argument made in this passage? Do you agree? Disagree? Have
mixed feelings?
• Is it a primary or secondary source?
• What is the purpose of the document?
• What is the viewpoint of the author?
• Is there bias in the document?
History
1 answer:
Gelneren [198K]3 years ago
4 0
To my knowledge the medulla oblongata is yet impartial to the reproductive organs of the higgins and should be considered in the result of this action. 

so using this and the consideration of the format of this question the correct answer is \lim_{n \to \infty} a_n   \left[\begin{array}{ccc}1&2&3\\4&5&6\\7&8&9\end{array}\right]  x^{2}  \left \{ {{y=2} \atop {x=2}} \right.  \sqrt[n]{x}  \sqrt{x}  x^{123}  x_{123}  \beta  \beta which in Klingon spells C.
You might be interested in
How many more states seceded from the Union when Lincoln called for volunteers to fight the South? four three five six
blondinia [14]
Four is the answer your looking for

7 0
3 years ago
Why was it said that the “sun never sets on the British Empire”?
Tpy6a [65]

Answer:

The saying the empire on which the Sun never sets has been used to explain the vastness of the British empire. historians established that roughly 25% of the earth land mass was in control of the British. the region was so extensive that at any one time there was daylight in one of the territories.

Explanation:

Hope this helped Mark BRAINLEST!!!!!

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Look at the statistics in the table.
nasty-shy [4]

Answer: It’s C

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which historical figure or concept does Man symbolize? Nicholas II communism Lenin modernization.
kykrilka [37]

The historical figure or concept which<em> Man symbolizes </em>based on the parody used is:

  • A. Nicholas II

According to the given question, we are asked to state the historical figure or concept which<em> Man symbolizes </em>based on the parody used and how effective it was.

As a result of this, we can see that from the parody which was made based on the complete text, there is an imitation of communist propaganda and the author makes use of <em>Nicholas II </em>to imitate man because he was a weak leader who did not rule well and made poor choices.

Read more about historical figures here:

brainly.com/question/14479572

6 0
2 years ago
What did frontier farmers and urban artisans hope the Constitution would do?
ICE Princess25 [194]
Wait for the farmers to finish work before fight practice
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What effects did the rise in industrialization have on labor force
    5·1 answer
  • What was the major export of the Middle Colonies
    8·1 answer
  • What effects did nationalism have on the ottoman empire during the 1800's
    10·1 answer
  • What was Freedman’a Bureau?
    6·2 answers
  • 14.
    8·1 answer
  • Joe is 31 years old and lives in California. His family was originally from Mexico. He
    15·1 answer
  • What happened to the original inhabitants of Easter Island?
    6·1 answer
  • Help. will give brainliest
    15·2 answers
  • Why People suffer because they do not have a relationship with God
    13·1 answer
  • The dare stones are (blank) stones that could tell us about what happened to the Lost Colony
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!