1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
murzikaleks [220]
3 years ago
12

The only shadow of an argument, that can be brought to support the repeal of the Stamp Act, is that our trade with that country

will suffer, if we enforce the tax with spirit and rigour. I grant it will—but what then? It will suffer only for a time; and this necessary severity will support and secure it for the future. Whereas if the tax is repealed, it will give a blow to our trade, that will be felt for ages—it will open a channel to the Americans for a free commerce with all the world: The manufactures of this country will be rejected, in proportion as other nations underwork, and undersell us: In short, America will be no longer British, but German, French, Spanish, Russian—and what not? Forbid it Heaven, that I should live to see the day, when a country, which has cost us so much blood and treasure to defend, will be made the bubble of popularity, or the plaything of power; liable to be blown away by vanity on one hand, or lost, by childish weakness and timidity, on the other.
...
The Americans imbibe notions of independence and liberty with their very milk, and will some time or other shake off all subjection. If we yield to them in this particular, by repealing the Stamp-Act, it is all over; they will from that moment assert their freedom. Whereas if we enforce the Act, we may keep them in dependence for some years longer: they are not yet in a condition to resist us—they cannot live without our manufactories ...

• Does the statement support or build on a point in any of the other documents?
• Does it argue the other side of any of those points?
• Does this passage tell you something important about the author's point of view?
• How do you feel about the argument made in this passage? Do you agree? Disagree? Have
mixed feelings?
• Is it a primary or secondary source?
• What is the purpose of the document?
• What is the viewpoint of the author?
• Is there bias in the document?
History
1 answer:
Gelneren [198K]3 years ago
4 0
To my knowledge the medulla oblongata is yet impartial to the reproductive organs of the higgins and should be considered in the result of this action. 

so using this and the consideration of the format of this question the correct answer is \lim_{n \to \infty} a_n   \left[\begin{array}{ccc}1&2&3\\4&5&6\\7&8&9\end{array}\right]  x^{2}  \left \{ {{y=2} \atop {x=2}} \right.  \sqrt[n]{x}  \sqrt{x}  x^{123}  x_{123}  \beta  \beta which in Klingon spells C.
You might be interested in
What did the great society demand to end?​
Mamont248 [21]

Answer:

The Great Society rests on abundance and liberty for all. It demands an end to poverty and racial injustice, to which we are totally committed in our time. But that is just the beginning. The Great Society is a place where every child can find knowledge to enrich his mind and to enlarge his talents.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
1. Where was the imaginary Line of Demarcation<br> drunn?
lozanna [386]

Answer:

The imaginary line of Demarcation was drawn from the north to the south through the Atlantic Ocean, splitting it between Portugal and Spain.

3 0
3 years ago
How does the U.S constitution best reflect the ideal of checks and balances
jasenka [17]

Answer:

The system of checks and balances is an important part of the Constitution. With checks and balances, each of the three branches of government can limit the powers of the others. This way, no one branch becomes too powerful.

Explanation:

:) Hope that helped!

6 0
3 years ago
Part B
gtnhenbr [62]

They were most likely feeling proud spirtual and happy

This is shown in this part of the hymn.

Glory! Glory! Hallelujah! Glory! Glory! Hallelujah

Glory! Glory! Hallelujah! His truth is marching on

8 0
3 years ago
Why did the British occupy Philadelphia?
bearhunter [10]
  <span>On September 11, 1777 British General William Howe's army defeated George Washington's army defending Philadelphia at the Battle of Brandywine. Washington and his army were forced to retreat, there was no longer an American army defending Philadelphia. The British marched in and occupied Philadelphia...until the fortunes of war changed and the British left Philadelphia in June, 1778 without a fight.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • "And so even though we face the difficulties of today and tomorrow, I still have a dream. It is a dream deeply
    8·2 answers
  • The treaty of Versailles was especially harsh against which participant in the war?
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following could be considered characteristic of the Greek city-state Athens?
    10·2 answers
  • What brought an end to the system of serf labor? Lords found cheaper workers for their lands. Peasants replaced serfs in the fie
    13·2 answers
  • Why did the cartoonist show the orb and scepter falling from Napoleon’s hands?
    9·1 answer
  • What did Napoleon become in 1799? What government did he replace?
    11·1 answer
  • In the early 1800s, most states in the North were
    11·2 answers
  • What animal made hunting easier for the Plains Native Americans?
    13·2 answers
  • What were the Japanese plans for the battle of midway?
    8·2 answers
  • I WILL GIVE A BRAINIEST FOR THE SAMPLE RESPONSE!!
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!