The answer is A is just is because it's logic
Freedom to press can be useful as can freedom to remain silent and innocent until proven guilty they have to prove your guilty not prove your innocents
Answer:
THE HARD R THE HARD R THE HARD R THE HARD R THE HARD R THE HARD R THE HARD R
Explanation:
HOPE THIS HELPS IF IT IS WHAT I REALLY THINK IT WAS I'LL DO THAT TOO
Hazirah can legally claim the remaining balance of Intan's debt because there was no acceptance of the offer from Johan that the part-payment should serve as full settlement.
<h3>What is the law of contract?</h3>
The law of contract deals with the enforcement of promises when certain elements are present. These contract elements include offer, acceptance, consideration, and intention.
Intan should remember that a valid and enforceable contract has conditions. We cannot claim there is an implied acceptance of Johan's offer. Johan cannot modify the contract terms between Intan and Hazirah because he was not a party to the contract.
Lastly, Johan did not offer any consideration for Hazirah to forfeit the balance of RM5,000. And Hazirah remained silent during Johan's informal negotiations without communicating her acceptance.
Thus, there was <u>no </u><u>contract</u><u> </u>between Johan and Hazirah, and Intan should do well to repay the balance.
Learn more about the elements of a contract at brainly.com/question/8116487
Answer:
The system of checks and balances is an important part of the Constitution. With checks and balances, each of the three branches of government can limit the powers of the others. This way, no one branch becomes too powerful
Explanation:
Hope it helps
