1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
rewona [7]
2 years ago
5

WILL GIVE YOU BRAINLIEST

Law
2 answers:
AlekseyPX2 years ago
8 0
Your answer is B. Conciseness as it is the quality of expressing ideas quickly
Ganezh [65]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

B. Conciseness

Explanation:

the quality of being short and clear, and expressing what needs to be said without unnecessary words:

You might be interested in
What is the process of bureaucratic rule making?
torisob [31]

Answer: The federal bureaucracy has a huge influence on policymaking and its rule making process is explained below.

Explanation:

The federal bureaucracy carry out three main tasks in government which are administration, implementation, and regulation. Bureaucrats put the policies of government into practice. The federal bureaucracy has a huge influence on policymaking. For policies to be passed, the bureaucracy works with the president and the Congress.

The federal bureaucracy develops rules that affect the operation of programs, and the rules must be adhered to. There are stages in the Rule-Making process. When Congress passes new laws, series of rules are proposed which are presented in the Federal Register. The parties interested can give their opinion on the rules. After the final regulation is published by the agency, the rules are then enforced after sixty days. During the waiting period, the rules can be adjusted by the Congress. If no changes are made, the rules become effective at the end of sixty days.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
You are researching Westward Expansion to California. Your first Internet search brings up too many unrelated topics. How can yo
Lubov Fominskaja [6]
A should be the correct answer
5 0
2 years ago
From whom does the order for probation originate?
Olin [163]
Probation originated from a probation officer.
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
2What do the Miranda warnings guarantee besides the right to remain sllent? D The right to a falr trial B The right to a trlal b
LenKa [72]
C

You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you.
8 0
3 years ago
DUE TODAY!!! PLEASE HELP!!!
saveliy_v [14]

Answer:

Retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor encouraged her staff to enjoy whitewater rafting, Mexican take-out brunch and tours of the Smithsonian. Justice Stephen Breyer loves to read French manuscripts and cultivated his distaste for footnotes during his clerkship to Arthur Goldberg. Such details were plentiful as Professor John Feerick introduced Justice O'Connor and her former colleague Justice Breyer to a well-heeled audience of lawyers and law students at Fordham Law School yesterday morning.

The two justices, and co-hosts of the day's symposium, sat together at a small table for their introductory panel, "Judicial Independence and Impartiality." Sandra Day O'Connor, dressed in a violet suit with gold buttons, her blonde hair now a shock of snowy white, frowned as she tried to twist the top off her water bottle, then leaned over towards Breyer and held it out to him. He wordlessly took it, unscrewed the top, and handed it back.

Sally Rider, Director of the William Rehnquist Center at the University of Arizona, kicked things off with a series of questions. Why, she asked O'Connor, did she decide to convene this conference on judicial independence in the first place?

O'Connor said she remembered seeing  "Impeach Earl Warren" signs in New Mexico and Arizona when she was growing up, and said that in her final years on the Supreme Court, attacks on judges increased, including proposals for mass impeachments of judges involved in the Terri Schiavo case, or proposals to cut judicial terms short, or a particularly disconcerting movement towards "Jail4Judges," a campaign to allow citizen panels to review rulings from the bench, with the ability to even imprison—as the name tantalizingly implies—those who made bad decisions. These developments were "very depressing," she said, and so she decided to use her retirement to call attention to these attacks on judges.

"An independent judiciary is an essential bedrock principle, and we're losing it."  The reason was in part the fact that civics and government are not a requirement for high school graduation. "One third of Americans can't name the three branches of government, but two thirds can name a judge on American Idol!"

Money has been pouring in to state judicial elections in recent years, including races for State Supreme Court justices. A 2004 campaign for a seat on the Illinois Supreme Court brought in a record-setting $9.3 million in political contributions, including hundreds of thousands of dollars from State Farm, a company with a case pending before the court. And just recently,  Wisconsin voters were subjected to over 11,000 televised campaign ads in the weeks before their state's Supreme Court race, over ninety percent of which were purchased by special interest groups (racking up a bill of well over 3.6 million dollars). Said O'Connor, "We put cash in the courtrooms, and it's just wrong." She then pointed to the room of lawyers and students. "You should take this seriously." (A later panel backed up O'Connor's concerns. New York Times legal correspondent Adam Liptak, Brennan Center attorney James Sample and Professor Michael Dimino discussed evidence that judges tend to rule in favor of their campaign contributors.)

She went on. "No other nation in the world elects judges." She pointed to Georgina Woods, the chief justice of Ghana, sitting in the front row, as if to illustrate her point.

"Why are we tolerating this? What are we going to do about it?" Then, seeming to remember that the initial question posed to her several minutes before was "why did you convene this conference," she added, "That's why," and sat back in her chair. The audience laughed and applauded.

Breyer took the floor next. Keeping state courts impartial is a major issue, but try talking about it with people "and they're asleep after five minutes." He recounted a trip to Russia he had made when serving as an appellate judge for the First Circuit after he was appointed by Carter. Meeting with Russian judges from across the country, he was surprised to hear their accounts of "telephone justice," when the party boss calls and tells judges which way to vote. "They asked me, ‘do you have telephone justice in the United States,' and I had to explain to them that no, the President wouldn't call you. He'd be crazy to do that."

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Heidi Klum has decided to produce and sell a signature fragrance. Klum spends countless hours with a bottle manufacturer coming
    5·1 answer
  • Jasper robs the home of Peter and Carly, two meth dealers. He steals expensive jewelry, meth equipment, and meth. You are the as
    15·1 answer
  • When may you drive in the left lane of a road with two lanes? With four lanes?
    15·1 answer
  • Read the three situations below and write the "check" or power that the branch of government would have on the situation. Use yo
    5·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP A S A P !!!!
    14·1 answer
  • Why should political parties have intra party elections
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an argument?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following identifies how the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the women's rights movement in
    13·1 answer
  • What is commercial practice
    5·2 answers
  • Why moon will be invisable in a day?​
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!