Answer:
either-or fallacy
Explanation:
In the either or fallacy a situation is presented as the only alternative of another situation. But in fact there are other alternatives of a situation.
Here, according to Marty unless people get rid of guns they will have to face the same situation of gun violence that people faced in Kentucky, Arkansas, and Colorado. He has not considered what might happen if the guns are still present. There are countries where the existance of guns and violence is not related.
Hence, Marty is using the either-or fallacy.
Price will be below equilibrium causing C to happen
It is the ennui. By the center of the nineteenth century, apathy moved toward becoming related with the estrangement of industrialization and present-day life. Craftsmen and writers experienced it, and soon a claim to apathy was a characteristic of otherworldly profundity and affectability. It inferred sentiments of prevalence and self-respect, the thought being that lone middle-class individuals<span> excessively tricked or doltish, making it impossible to see the essential purposelessness of any activity could be upbeat.</span>
Geez, I want to say the answer is John Watson. Sorry if im incorrect, but im 99.9 sure im tight
Answer:
WWII hadn’t happened yet.
Explanation:
It’s still called the Great War in some parts of Europe but back then it was easily the largest war to ever take place in human history.
