The problem was that the colonists were trying to take away a land which belonged to another people. Some native americans were able to let them go and enable them to live in peace where they chose, other native americans decided they would opt for the more harmful choice.
The statements referred by the question are:
a) It convinced the United States to dismantle its nuclear weapons.
b) It proved that a naval blockade was not an act of war.
c) It showed Cuba that communism should be stopped.
d) It brought the world dangerously close to nuclear war.
The correct statement is D. Historians agree the Missile Crisis was the closest the world got to have a nuclear war between the U.S. and USSR. Nothing before or after this came as close to be direct aggression from one of these countries against the other.
Statements A and C never happened: the U.S. has nuclear weapons until today, and Cuba didn't give up on communism.
Statement B doesn't fit the facts around the Missile Crisis. The naval blockade didn't lead to war only because the U.S. was defensive.
The right answer is "gave more political power to citizens" I hope it helps
Answers:
God rejected Saul for both disobediences: (1) offering a burnt offering against God’s commandment, and (2) not completely destroying the Amalekites.
Explanation:
In I Samuel, you can find that God rejected Saul from being king because he offered a burnt offering against God’s commandment. However, later we read that God rejected Saul from being king for not completely destroying the Amalekites.
