Answer:
Explanation:
While the President customarily delegates supreme command of the forces in active service, there is no constitutional reason why he should do so, and he has been known to resolve personally important questions of military policy. Lincoln early in 1862 issued orders for a general advance in the hopes of stimulating McClellan to action; Wilson in 1918 settled the question of an independent American command on the Western Front; Truman in 1945 ordered that the bomb be dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.206 As against an enemy in the field, the President possesses all the powers which are accorded by international law to any supreme commander. “He may invade the hostile country, and subject it to the sovereignty and authority of the United States.”207 In the absence of attempts by Congress to limit his power, he may establish and prescribe the jurisdiction and procedure of military commissions, and of tribunals in the nature of such commissions, in territory occupied by Armed Forces of the United States, and his authority to do this sometimes survives cessation of hostilities.208 He may employ secret agents to enter the enemy’s lines and obtain information as to its strength, resources, and movements.209 He may, at least with the assent of Congress, authorize commercial intercourse with the enemy.210 He may also requisition property and compel services from American citizens and friendly aliens who are situated within the theater of military operations when necessity requires, thereby incurring for the United States the obligation to render “just compensation.”211 By the same warrant, he may bring hostilities to a conclusion by arranging an armistice, stipulating conditions that may determine to a great extent the ensuing peace.212 He may not, however, effect a permanent acquisition of territory,213 though he may govern recently acquired territory until Congress sets up a more permanent regime.214
This semester, you have an assignment in which data collected from a previous assignment is included in the new project. Yes, we need to cite this information because it is academic practice to cite the previous work you have done.
In another instance, although you credited your sources and wrote a research paper, you forgot to record the page numbers for the in-text citations. You insert page numbers without double-checking them because the project is due in few hours. You cited someone, but you did so improperly, thus this is also a violation.
Following the right academic practice, while one submits their works, is essential as per the ethics.
To learn more about academic practice, click
brainly.com/question/27067194
#SPJ4
Answer: D
Explanation: It shows something might happen
Answer:
Culture and economics.
Explanation:
Nations, given the wide interconnection that globalization has generated, have signed huge amounts of treaties with other nations, in which economic, political, cultural, social, border, security, and all legal issues that otherwise affect or benefit said countries are agreed.
But governments, in all situations, must take as their main precaution not to directly or indirectly harm the economies of the countries involved, nor in any way harm the cultural identity of those nations.
Thus, these limitations regulate the framework of agreeability under which the nations will agree on certain conditions of the treaties.
