Answer:
the difference is the way how people react to certain situations.
Explanation:
A social problem is normally a term used to describe problems with a particular area or group of people in the world. Social problems often involve problems that affect the real world. One example is politics
Answer:
It extends the civil liberties provided in the US Bill of Rights to state governments.
Explanation:
The united states constitution and its amendments contained two things:
- the powers that can be enacted by the US government along with
- protection to citizens' basic rights written under the Bill of rights.
This created a question.
What would happen if in order to each the power of the government, they have to violate the rights of the citizen?
In early 1900s, the supreme court introduced the concept of selective incorporation to address this issue. According to this concept, the enactment of the government power under the constitution should be be incorporated selectively. They can be done as long as they do not violate the rights of the citizens.
Because of this, we can say that selective incorporation basically extends the civil liberties provided in the US Bill of Rights to state governments.
Hope this helps<span> eustress</span>
In this situation, the externalities that arise from studying is the unability to enter college and obtain good-paying jobs.
From the description above, we can conclude that Jacob is much more likely to experience these externalities since he does not consider the importance of studying and how it might influence his future.
Answer:
Judicial Review
Explanation:
Acts of the legislature (which is congress), the executive (presidency), state governments and other arms of government are subject to judicial review by the courts, most especially the supreme court. In other words, it is up to the supreme court to determine what is constitutional and what is unconstitutional.
A prominent example of a judicial review by the supreme court is the landmark case Roe v. Wade in 1973. The landmark judgement upended several state laws that prevented pregnant women from having abortions. The supreme court ruled that it was unconstitutional for the states to restrict pregnant women from having abortions as it violated their constitutional right of privacy.
