1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MA_775_DIABLO [31]
3 years ago
14

How much Germany most likely have been different between 184 and 1871 if Prussia had not belonged to the German confederation

History
2 answers:
krok68 [10]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:C. Germany would not have achieved unification as quickly.

Explanation:

sergey [27]3 years ago
7 0

The answer is C: Germany would not have achieved unification as quickly.

You might be interested in
Who is impacted by modern terrorism?
TEA [102]

People are impacted all across the globe


4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How was Montesquieu wrong about the English government?
Karo-lina-s [1.5K]

Answer: First, Montesquieu thought that the primary exercise of powers could durably be divided only where those powers differed in kind. Second, Montesquieu failed to recognize the lawmaking character of executive and judicial exposition of existing law.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Which of these provisions was included in the Treaty of Versailles (1919)? A) European disarmament B) self-determination of all
Luda [366]
D is the correct answer to this
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise both focused on
Nostrana [21]

Answer:  the representation of states in Congress.

<em>The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise both focused on  </em><em>the representation of states in Congress.</em>

Both of these compromises were devised during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787.  The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states.  The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size.  The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation.  The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature.  Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population.  In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery.  For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures.  (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.)   The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Capitalism definition in your own words PLEASE
Anastasy [175]

Answer:

an economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state.

Explanation:

you is the welcome

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 4. What are the negative effects of the iPhone?
    6·2 answers
  • What ideas of john locke did thomas jefferson put in the declaration of indapendence?
    7·1 answer
  • A student in the contemporary United States is researching the ancient Roman city of Pompeii, which was destroyed by a volcanic
    10·1 answer
  • At what time did Paul Revere go on his ride?
    6·1 answer
  • How did the roman empire gain power
    14·1 answer
  • Through a combination of daring, brutality, and greed, the conquistadors
    9·2 answers
  • What was the major food crop from the Middle Colonies? Fish Corn Wheat Bread
    6·1 answer
  • What three wars did more than 100,000 Americans die?​
    13·1 answer
  • Was delaware situation better under the articles of confederation
    10·1 answer
  • What were the differences among the conservative, radical, and moderate factions of the Republican Party during Reconstruction
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!