1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MA_775_DIABLO [31]
3 years ago
14

How much Germany most likely have been different between 184 and 1871 if Prussia had not belonged to the German confederation

History
2 answers:
krok68 [10]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:C. Germany would not have achieved unification as quickly.

Explanation:

sergey [27]3 years ago
7 0

The answer is C: Germany would not have achieved unification as quickly.

You might be interested in
Lowa and California have the same number of senators.<br> true<br> false
balandron [24]

Answer: among us in real life sus sus among us in real life sus sus

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did Hamilton believe it was important to pay back the debt owed to bond holders
ser-zykov [4K]
He thought is was the only way to convince people that the government would honor its. obligations.


Hope this helps!!
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was the policy of the appeasement a bad move by Britain and France
dedylja [7]

Answer:

The policy of appeasement made Hitler view France and Britain as weak and unwilling to engage in war.  As such, he repeatedly abused the policy of appeasement to secure ever more land or Lebensraum, (Living Space) for the German people.  

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Why would South Carolina feel like the tariff were unconstitutional?
ad-work [718]
The tariff was strongly opposed in the South, since it was perceived to put an unfair tax burden on the Southern agrarian states that imported most manufactured goods. The tariff's opponents expected that Jackson's election as President would result in a

5 0
3 years ago
Why were the Arabs able to conquer territory quickly.
alekssr [168]
They weren't so successful at conquering Europe or China. Of course, one can blame the long supply lines, but in these cases their adversaries were also determined to repulse them.

In contrast, Byzantium and Persia were exhausted from mutual warfare. Tribes related by kinship to Muslim Arabs had served as mercenaries during this period, so there was a lot of tactical knowledge available.

The Byzantines retreated to the highlands of Anatolia upon losing their lower-lying provinces to the Muslims. I am not sure if they launched a determined counter-attack. The Persians did, but they could not fight coherently.
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why is Attila the Hun a controversial historical figure
    7·2 answers
  • Where is Egypt located in relation to Kush?
    5·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes the message of this cartoon?
    11·2 answers
  • From the beginning of the revolution in 1789 until September 1792, what kind og government did France have
    6·1 answer
  • Before the civil service act of 1883 how are government appointments handled
    15·1 answer
  • How does Mandela
    7·1 answer
  • What is one of the major beliefs of Confucianism?
    7·1 answer
  • I need this done please
    10·1 answer
  • Which streaming service won a golden globe for the dramedy transparent?.
    11·1 answer
  • What is an economic model that compares the amount of competition among businesses in a similar roll
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!