1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
riadik2000 [5.3K]
2 years ago
10

The number of electoral votes is equal to what

History
1 answer:
densk [106]2 years ago
4 0
The Electoral College consists of 538 electors<span>. A majority of </span>270 electoral votes<span> is required to elect the President. Your state's entitled allotment of electors equals the number of members in its Congressional delegation: one for each member in the House of Representatives plus two for your Senators.

</span>
You might be interested in
When the aztec asked his god to show him a sign what happened?
leonid [27]
He threw him a pot of gold 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Plz plz plz answer answer answer i'LL GIB U BRAINLIEST IF CORRECT AND THANKS AND 5 STAR
ikadub [295]

Answer: 2,1,3,4

Explanation: i believe

5 0
2 years ago
Please answer ASAP!!!
natima [27]

Answer:

The answers is b

c d

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following statements about urbanization is false?
frez [133]
D Rural areas traditionally have been inhabited by wealthy people who do not need benefits
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the fundamentalist revolt take place
sergey [27]

Answer: What was the fundamentalist revolt?

The protestants felt threatened by the decline of value and increase in visibility of Catholicism and Judaism. The Fundamentalists ended up launching a campaign to rid Protestant denominations of modernism and to combat the new individual freedoms that seemed to contradict traditional morals.

What caused fundamentalism?

The causes of Fundamentalism. Steve Bruce argues that the main causes of Fundamentalism are modernisation and secularisation, but we also need to consider the nature of the religions themselves and a range of 'external factors' to fully explain the growth of fundamentalist movements.

Fundamentalism, in the narrowest meaning of the term, was a movement that began in the late 19th- and early 20th-century within American Protestant circles to defend the "fundamentals of belief" against the corrosive effects of liberalism that had grown within the ranks of Protestantism itself. Liberalism, manifested in critical approaches to the Bible that relied on purely natural assumptions, or that framed Christianity as a purely natural or human phenomenon that could be explained scientifically, presented a challenge to traditional belief.

A multi-volume group of essays edited by Reuben Torrey, and published in 1910 under the title, The Fundamentals, was financed and distributed by Presbyterian laymen Lyman and Milton Stewart and was an attempt to arrest the drift of Protestant belief. Its influence was large and was the source of the labeling of conservatives as "fundamentalists."

Useful for looking at this history of fundamentalism are George Marsden's Fundamentalism and American Culture: The Shaping of Twentieth-Century Evangelicalism, 1870-1925 (New York: Oxford, 1980), Bruce B. Lawrence, Defenders of God: The Fundamentalist Revolt against the Modern Age (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1989), David Beale, In Pursuit of Purity: American Fundamentalism Since 1850 (Greenville: Unusual Publications, 1986), and Mark A. Noll, A History of Christianity in the United States and Canada (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1992).

Lately, the meaning of the word "fundamentalism" has expanded. This has happened in the press, in academia, and in ordinary language. It appears to be expanding to include any unquestioned adherence to fundamental principles or beliefs, and is often used in a pejorative sense. Nowadays we hear about not only Protestant evangelical fundamentalists, but Catholic fundamentalists, Mormon fundamentalists, Islamic fundamentalists, Hindu fundamentalists, Buddhist fundamentalists, and even atheist or secular or Darwinian fundamentalists.

Scholars of religion have perhaps indirectly contributed to this expansion of the term, as they have tried to look for similarities in ways of being religious that are common in various systems of belief. Between 1991 and 1995, religion scholars Martin Marty and Scott Appleby published a 5-volume collection of essays as part of "The Fundamentalism Project" at the University of Chicago, which is an example of this approach. Appleby is co-author of Strong Religion (2003), also from the University of Chicago Press that attempts to give a common explanatory framework for understanding anti-modern and anti-secular religious movements around the world.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • All of the following are famous modern economics EXCEPT
    8·2 answers
  • how did a warming climate 12000 to 10000 years ago impact the paleo-indians living in the americas at the line
    5·1 answer
  • What statement is false in regards to how did Native Americans conceive of private property? 1. Families might use a specific pl
    7·1 answer
  • The timeline shows key events in World War I and World War II. According to the events on the timeline, which is the best conclu
    6·2 answers
  • How did the power of the government change during the civil war and the great depression?
    11·1 answer
  • What did most Americans understand before their country entered World War I?
    7·1 answer
  • Help for ela work ty
    15·2 answers
  • People who identify with conservative ideals would most likely associate with which group?
    6·1 answer
  • How is the doctrine of states’ rights used today by different political factions?
    7·1 answer
  • What examples does Carnegie give to support his argument?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!