It would be B.) E-commerce this term is used to describe buying and selling products online.
Answer:
the options are missing, so I looked for them:
a. The buying of government bonds leads to lower interest rates, thereby reducing private investment.
b. The selling of government bonds leads to higher interest rates, thereby reducing private investment.
c. The selling of government bonds leads to lower interest rates, thereby reducing private investment.
d. The buying of government bonds leads to higher interest rates, thereby reducing private investment.
the answer is:
b. The selling of government bonds leads to higher interest rates, thereby reducing private investment.
Explanation:
The crowding out effect happens when the government increases its spending level in order to engage in an expansionary fiscal policy but someone needs to pay for this extra spending. In order for the government to finance their spending, they have to choose to either increase taxes or issue more debt. When they issue more debt, they end up decreasing private investment since money that could be used by private companies is used by the government instead.
Answer:
C. Both (i) and (ii) are true
Explanation:
Under perfect price discrimination, consumer surplus doesn't exist since the supplier is selling the good or service at the maximum price that each consumer is willing to pay. This situation maximizes supplier surplus.
Under perfect competition, both supplier and consumer surplus exist.
Since total social surplus = supplier surplus + consumer surplus, total surplus should be the same in both situations.
Answer:
Wages in US would decrease
Wages in Mexico would increase
Explanation:
The increase in the supply of labour in the US while demand remains unchanged would lead to an excess of supply over demand. This would cause equilibrium wage to fall and quantity to rise.
While in the US, the supply of labour would fall. This would increase wage.
I hope my answer helps you
