The Americans were affected by the structure of the AOC was they had to adapt to a new way of government and new laws were created. I hope it helps!
It challenged the concept of divine right and gave some rights to the nobility that were previously held only to the monarch.
<span>This is of course somewhat of a subjective question, but in general most would agree that in general expansion was not justifiable since the Mexicans and Natives were doing nothing to provoke the US. One could argue it was justifiable since Americans needed more land. </span>
The difference lies in interpreting the two sides of the conflict. McPherson saw the war as the war between the evil South and the good North. He was focused on the abolition of slavery and their integration into the society as free people. Horwitz on the other hand saw South not as evil but as a faction which went to war to protect its economic interests.
Answer:
African tribes involved in the Atlantic slave trade.
Explanation:
The slavery system had existed before the arrival of European in Africa. According to some historians, slavery practised in different tribes in the west and central region of Africa. The existence of various ethnic group led to conflicts between themselves that produced captives who could become part of a local slave trade system. The pattern of the trade changes with the shipping of slaves in America. Europeans took advantage of the remaining slave system in Africa to obtain the labour for a plantation economy in the New World.
The Middle Passage was a stage of the Triangular Trade that connected three continents. Europe took manufactured goods and material to Africa in exchange for African slaves from local African leaders. The enslaved African came in America as labours to work in fields in the Southern colonies. Slaves sold to their buyer in return for raw materials for industries in England like cotton, indigo, etc.
