All categories

3 years ago

In the oral tradition, each telling or singing of a story differed from the last.

1 answer:

7 0

Yes, the answer is definitely A - true. In the oral tradition, obviously, people didn't use written texts, they told their tales from memory. And of course they would add something, or remove something else, or use a different vocabulary from the person who told them that story. It cannot be told in the exact same way the previous person told it, it is impossible.

You might be interested in

Read the excerpt from the Declaration of Independence. What ideas are associated with the words justice, magnanimity, and corres

NARA [144]

Answer:

c. peace and friendship

Explanation:

took the test

6 0

3 years ago

How is the protagonist's writing influenced by her brother's experience in Vietnam?

vladimir1956 [14]

The writing of the protagonist was influenced by the experience as he illustrated that they had a similar biographical background.

<h3>Who is a protagonist?</h3>

It should be noted that a protagonist simply means the main character that's in a story.

The story is simply titled "The Vietnam War". It emerged in the 1950s during the cold war. At this time, Americans served as advisors to the Vietnamese and the French.

The writing of the protagonist was influenced by her brother's experience in Vietnam. The brother recounted the war to the narrator and this impacted his writing.

Learn more about protagonist on:

brainly.com/question/684224

5 0

3 years ago

Read the excerpt from Blanca Flor by Angel Vigil.

Vanyuwa [196]

Answer: A

Explanation: I'M THE BEST AT THIS !!!!!!!

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which character in Grendel is more clearly a round character?

elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]

Answer:

Grendel. Although the same characters appear in both Beowulf and Grendel, their characteristics are not the same. Whereas in Beowulf, the round character would be Beowulf, in Grendel that would be Grendel.

Explanation:

wasss good!

4 0

3 years ago

Match each analogy to the type of word relationship it illustrates. part-to-whole relationship item-category relationship cause

cestrela7 [59]

Answer:

part-to-whole relationship: tail:mouse / scale:crocodile

item-category relationship: Monday:weekday / Saturday:weekend

cause-and-effect relationship: cut:bleed / burn:irritate

Explanation:

In an analogy, we find a relationship between different things, something that connects them. Let's analyze the analogies above.

A mouse is a whole that can be divided into several parts: ears, tails, paws, etc. The same goes for a crocodile: teeth, scales, stomach. Thus, with tail:mouse and scale:crocodile, we have a relationship of part to whole.

There are different days in a week: Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, etc. Those days can be divided under different categories. Monday, for instance, can be categorized as a weekday. However, Saturday would be categorized under weekend since it is not a weekday. Thus, with Monday:weekday and Saturday:weekend, we have an item-category relationship.

Finally, if you cut yourself, you will most likely bleed. Bleeding is the effect of being cut. Cutting is the cause of bleeding. The same goes for getting burned (cause) and the skin getting irritated (effect). Thus, with cut:bleed and burn:irritate, the relationship is of cause and effect.

5 0

3 years ago