1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
stepan [7]
3 years ago
15

12. Find the smaller of 2 consecutive integers,

Mathematics
1 answer:
emmasim [6.3K]3 years ago
6 0

The smaller of 2 consecutive integers is -15. The equation to determine the  consecutive integers is x + (x + 1) = -29

<u>Solution:</u>

Given that sum of two consecutive integer is -29.

Need to write the equation and determine the smaller of 2 consecutive integers.

Let’s smaller integer be represented by variable x

So bigger consecutive integer will be represented by x + 1  

As sum of two integer = -29

=> x + (x + 1) = -29

=> 2x + 1 = -29    

=> 2x + 30 = 0   ----------(1)

On solving equation (1) for x we get

2x =-30

=> x = -15

Smallest integer = x = -15

Bigger integer = x + 1 = -15 + 1 = -14

Hence required smaller integer = -15 and required equation is x + (x + 1) = -29

You might be interested in
Round to the place of the underlined digit 624,531 (4)
Alex_Xolod [135]
That would be 625,000
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A group of students was discussing the meaning of this statement. They were arguing back and forward about whether the converse
Savatey [412]

Answer:

The statement is missing. The statement is -- "A ray can be part of a line."

The answer is : The converse is not true, so Jahmiah is correct.

Step-by-step explanation:

A conditional statement is represented by showing p → q. It means if p is correct or true,  then q is also correct or true.

And the converse of p → q can be shown as  q → p.

But we know that the converse of a statement is not always true, it may be true and may not be true.

In the context, the statement is " a ray can be a part of a line." And so the converse would be  "A line can be a part of the ray".

So by definition we know that a line is continuous line having no end points, it extends in one direction. While a ray starts from a point and extends to infinity in one direction.

Thus ray is part of line but line is not a part of the ray. So the converse of the statement is not correct.

Hence, Jahmiah is correct.

6 0
3 years ago
What is the area, in square meters, of the rhombus above?
Sidana [21]

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please answer this correctly without making mistakes
Triss [41]

Answer:

2+3s

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Simplify the rational expression 6x-24/16-x^2
8_murik_8 [283]
The answer would be -x^2 + 6x  - 3/2
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What’s the correct answer for this?
    15·1 answer
  • Find the vertex and the axis of symmetry of the graph of the function?
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a rational number
    12·2 answers
  • What is the first quartile
    5·1 answer
  • A student records a physical property of a rock as 2.2N. Which physical property has the student measured?
    11·1 answer
  • write an equation in slope intercept form of the line passes through the given point and is parallel to the graph of the given e
    8·1 answer
  • Two functions, function A and function B, are shown below:
    12·2 answers
  • How could you use coordinate geometry to prove that BC AD?
    15·1 answer
  • I don't understand no this at all​
    5·1 answer
  • Which expression can be used to find 57% of 230? ⊥ω⊥
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!