Answer:
Answer in Explanation
Explanation:
As a historian, using sources would better help understand the past. Using mostly primary sources would better help understand the past as you were there or you get information from someone who was involved in the concept. Before we get into this, a primary source provides firs-handed accounts of an event or time period and are mostly considered very useful and best when explaining a period of time where something great happened. A secondary source describes a summary or discussed information originally presented by another source. That means that the words and what actually happened, could have been altered in a way to best fit the story or change the readers perspective. While using a primary source or secondary source, like a newspaper, it's somewhat difficult to tell which source it is, so you have to trust your gut. Now, as a historian, you would much rather use a primary source since it provides first-hand detail of what happened and what you'd want to share. Overall, it may be said that using a primary source when you're working with something with time, or an event, would be best; rather than a secondary source.
Answer:
the <em>protagonist</em> and <em>antagonist</em> have <em>conflict</em>, which builds up to the <em>climax</em>
“Harlem” by Langston Hughes describes the oppression of African Americans back then. Major themes in it included delay, sadness, and dreams.
I don’t know what you view the American identity as so I’ll give you a few questions about your perspective that you can fill in. What do you view yourself as? Do you identify as an American or would you call yourself something else. What culture do you belong in?
Finally, to summarize state what your identify has in-common to Langston Hughes poem. One thing you could do is say you also pursue your dreams in hope of it successfully occurring.
Answer:
The human intellect began to awake, to stretch itself, to go forth and conquer, which hence brought about
the invention of printing.
Explanation:
Here the author mentions that an intellectual awakening was beginning to occur, then directly states that it eventually lead to the invention of printing. Since it was during the beginning of this awakening that the printing press was invented, it is implied by the author in the sentence that the printing press would lead to a greater awakening
Answer:
I think it's explain because he asked him to answer him
