I believe the answer is: A microhistorian might document one day in a town that experienced particularly high unemployment levels, while a comparative historian might graph unemployment levels in several cities throughout the Great Depression.
Microhistorian tend to choose that method because they tend to favour a more intensive research within smaller unit of research (such as villages, small neighbourhood, etc). Comparative historian on the other hand, might choose that method because they favour research technique that collect as many data as possible from one segment of historical period and compared it with the another.
King and his supporters fought segregation by peaceful protest and marches. king never wanted to fight back or use violence to end segregation.
It was called <span>the Great Leap Forward.
The </span>New Deal and <span>Great Society were American and the </span><span>New Frontier was not an economic plan. </span>
By the conclusion of the war millions where now living in the United States
I only know of two and their names were, Jose Antonio Navarro and Jose Francisco Ruiz.
I hope that helped you at least a little, I'm sorry I can't tell you the third
