1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Georgia [21]
4 years ago
12

2. How can both Sue and Sam be correct when Sue claims the commerce clause increases government’s power and Sam claims the comme

rce clause reduces government’s power?
Business
1 answer:
Maru [420]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:

When Sue claims the commerce clause increases government power she speaks of the federal government however when sam states that the commerce clause reduces government power he would be speaking of the state government.

Explanation:

The power of the federal government was expanded by the Commerce clause because it gave the federal government to regulate money and foreign trade.gives power to the states on everything not clearly given to the federal government.

the Commerce Clause as a restraint upon state exercises of power, absent congressional action, received no sustained justification or explanation; the clause, of course, empowers Congress, not the courts, to regulate commerce among the states.

The Commerce Clause does not give the federal government the power to abrogate the sovereign immunity of the states. Many described the Rehnquist Court's Commerce Clause cases as a doctrine of "New Federalism".

You might be interested in
An employee earns $24 per hour and 1.5 times that rate for all hours in excess of 40 hours per week. If the employee worked 50 h
Anettt [7]

Answer:

a. Gross pay = $1,320

b. Net pay = $917

Explanation:

a. Determine the gross pay for the week. $ If applicable, round your final answer to two decimal places.

Pay for 40 hours = 40 * $24 = $960

Pay for excess of 50 hours = (50 - 40) * $24 * 1.5 = $360

Gross pay = $960 + $360 = $1,320

b. Determine the net pay for the week.

Net pay = $1,320 - ($1,320 * 6.0%) - ($1,320 * 1.5%) - $304 = $917.

3 0
3 years ago
Your healthy 63-year-old neighbor is about to retire and comes to you for advice. From talking with her, you find out she was pl
pashok25 [27]

Answer:

Both mutual funds and money market funds are similar in the sense that they pool money from several investors in a variety of instruments. The difference is that money market funds pool the money in very liquid, short-term securities, while mutual funds do the same but in less liquid, longer-term securities.

The 63-year-old neighbor should therefore split the money around 60/40, 60% of the funds for mutual funds, in order to have long-term security, and 40% in the money market funds, in order to have quick cash available when needed.

5 0
3 years ago
Consider this scenario: in response to an increase in the product's price, producers of mp3 players have increased the quantity
kvv77 [185]
<span>Consider this scenario: in response to an increase in the product's price, producers of mp3 players have increased the quantity supplied. this is an example of Law of Supply.  </span><span>The </span>law of supply<span> states that the quantity of a good supplied rises as the market price rises, and falls as the price falls. </span>
7 0
4 years ago
If producers moved the price from P3 to p1 A) producers would encounter a shortage. B) buyers would likely purchase fewer widget
andrew-mc [135]

Answer: D) buyers would scramble to get all available widgets.

Explanation:

The law of demand states that more quantity is demanded at a lower price, therefore if producers move prices from P3 to P1  there would be an increase in quantity of widgets demanded. Buyers would scramble to get all available widgets wich will create a shortage in the market

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Respond by (1) Identifying the type of syllogism below (Categorical, Disjunctive, Conditional) and (2) explain, in your own word
Darya [45]

The syllogism used is conditional, that is, it occurs through deductive reasoning, because if the minor premise is true, the minor premise will also be true.

<h3 /><h3>What is Conditional syllogism?</h3>

It is a type of syllogism widely used in everyday life, but the conclusion is not always true, because despite having two true premises, the conclusion can be false, because the argumentation is not always valid, as it does not directly represent the premises.

Therefore, despite being syllogisms that follow the pattern of "If" and "then" to express a logic, the conclusion will not always be true, as this type of syllogism can also be hypothetical.

Find out more about syllogism here:

brainly.com/question/361872

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A random sample of 12 lunch orders at noodles and company showed a mean bill of $12.99 with a standard deviation of $4.6. find t
    5·1 answer
  • The actions an organization can and perhaps should take while an incident is in progress should be specified in a document calle
    13·1 answer
  • Tom sells his father's watch for $100 to sue. he later finds out from his father that the watch was an expensive rolex. tom want
    13·1 answer
  • The _____ is a nationwide group of international trade attorneys who provide free initial consultations to small businesses on e
    10·1 answer
  • According to the eNotes, when a potential customer sees the line, but never joins the line because they think it looks too long
    13·1 answer
  • Select all that apply.
    10·2 answers
  • What is one way to speed up the acquisition of a classically conditioned response?
    13·1 answer
  • Several major Asian and European cities have begun restricting vehicular travel to reduce congestion and/or pollution. Several m
    12·1 answer
  • you invest $1300 in an account at interest rate r, compounded continuously. Find the time required for the amount to double and
    10·1 answer
  • The objective section of a resume should consist of no more than:
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!