They both worked for social equality, but only DuBois battled for economic equality.
- Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. DuBois both worked to advance the social and economic well-being of black people.
- One of these was that W.E.B. DuBois was the only one who worked for economic equality, while both battled for social equality.
- They both used various techniques to attain their aims.
<h3>Who was W.E.B. DuBois?</h3>
- W.E.B. DuBois (1868–1963) promoted social action initiatives to combat the ideology of white supremacy.
- He rejected the notion that white people were superior to African Americans.
- He wished to put an end to black people's repressive practices and policies.
- He battled for equal pay for equal work, better jobs for African Americans, and working conditions comparable to those of white people.
<h3>Who was T. Washington?</h3>
- Educator Booker T. Washington (1856–1915) was regarded as one of the most significant black leaders.
- He urged African Americans to accept the predicament that black people were in and concentrate on working hard and remaining patient to get out of it.
Learn more about T. Washington here:
brainly.com/question/13721792
#SPJ4
I think the answer is laid out in the question. When you live in a desert you are going to encounter many "Droughts", which are natural disasters..<span />
While many Americans know that they have a right to free speech, the lay opinion often views the degree of protection afforded by the United State Constitution as much broader than it is in reality. The First Amendment does not protect all types of speech.
The First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech.” While it states “Congress,” the protections are also against state government and local public officials from making any law that abridges a person’s freedom of speech. However, simply because the government cannot make a law of this nature does not mean that individuals are free to say anything that they want to. For example, employers may prohibit certain types of speech that would not violate a person’s First Amendment rights if the employer was not a public employer.
So I believe the answers would either be B or C (:
Thanks me and mark as brainliest (:
Answer:
transportation
Explanation
without trains, cars or even good old horseback we would not be able to disperse trade goods or necessities such as food and medical supplies to others