<span>as I past the kitchen door
should be
as I passed the kitchen door
</span>
Two good things that body paragraphs should contain is evidence/cite/quote and an answer to the original question or topic. <span />
The word or phrase broken into syllables.
the word or phrase with the pronunciation indicated through the use of diacritical marks – marks that indicate the vowel sounds such as a long vowel or a vowel affected by other sounds; accent marks, a mark called the schwa that tells you that the vowel is in an unaccented syllable of the word.
the part or parts of speech the word functions as – for example as a noun (n.), verb (v.), adjective (adj.), or adverb (adv.).
related forms of the word, such as the plural form of nouns and the past tense of verbs.
the definition or definitions of the word or phrase. Generally dictionaries group the definitions according to a word's use as a noun, verb, adjective, and/or adverb.
the origin, or etymology, of the word or words, such as from the Latin, Old French, Middle English, Hebrew, the name of a person. Some dictionaries use the symbol < to mean "came from." For example, the origin of the word flank is given as "<Old French flanc<Germanic." This tells us that flank came from the Old French word fanc. The French word in turn came from the German language. Some dictionaries use abbreviations to tell you where the item came from: OE for Old English, L for Latin, and so forth.
Answer: a command(an imperative sentence)
Explanation: You think there is no subject? No, there is an implied "you", so the sentence is a command.
This is very interesting. I don't remember it at all, and I should. However, I think there is an answer.
First there is Boxer's reaction. He had a very pragmatic view of what the bank notes meant. If you can't eat them, of what value are they? They seem an awful trade to him: at least the timber had use.
So he doesn't like the deal, but the pigs are the masters and no one argues with them.
It isn't D. Fredrick is a louse. He will deceive anyone if there is gain for him in it.
Napoleon really isn't deceitful in this passage. He is very vain. C is not quite right, but it maybe your best answer.
I don't see what B has to do with anything.
A historically has not been proven to be true. Tread carefully around a dictator. They can do you a great deal of damage. Mao for example did not seek approval: he demanded it and he killed millions getting that approval. Same with Stalin.
It is either A or C. A is true of Napoleon. It is not true of the worst dictators of the last century. C doesn't seem to fit, but I can't get rid of it. The answer is between those two. You are going to have to pick or choose one of the other two. I'd pick A myself, but I'd sure be holding my nose.
