Both codes incorporate the conceptual framework approach for evaluating threats when specific rules on a matter do not exist.
Explanation:
IFAC has enacted a Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (IESBA Code), the International Ethics Standards Committee for Competent. The latest IESBA Code edition was upgraded and modified in July 2009 and comes into force on 1 January 2011. The adjustments clarified and considerably strengthened the independence specifications for all competent accountants.
IESBA and AICPA are more comparable than they are, but there are substantial differences. In many instances it will produce similar effects if codes are added to the same pattern of truth.
The IESBA Code deals with a number of possible independence issues which are covered by the AICPA Conceptual Structure but not AICPA. Examples include the Long Senior Human Resources Group (including Team Rotation).
Certain independence restrictions are enforced by the IESBA Code representing the "extent of public interest in certain companies" (i.e. entities listed on an accepted stock exchange for whose shares are listed), and institutions whose auditors are legally or administrative authorities required to comply with the same requirements for independence as the listings).
The IESBA splits the conditions for freedom into two regions. Section 290 offers the toughest prohibitions and includes accounting reports and audits. Section 291 generally provides less stringent requirements of freedom for all other insurance obligations. The AICPA does not change the principles of equality.
Answer:
b) Debt Investments: 520,000 | Interest Revenue: 12,500 | Cash: 532,500
Explanation:
The journal entry to record the purchase of the bond is shown below:
Debt investment Dr $500,000 × 1.04) $520,000
Interest revenue Dr ($500,000 × 10% × 3 ÷ 12) $12,500
To Cash $532,500
(being the purchase of the bond is recorded)
Here the debt investment and interest revenue is debited as it increase the assets and decreased the revenue while on the other hand the cash is credited as it decreased the assets
Hence, the correct option is b.
Answer:
1.425 dollars of value added
Explanation:
The value of the painting added by Caroline is between the $75 dollar of raw materials and the $1,500 which is the amount at which she sold the canvas in the art gallery.
If, over the course of time the canvas market value increase this will not change the value added by Caroline.
1,500 - 75 = 1.425 dollars
Answer:
<u>Executed</u>
Explanation:
Ratification of a contract refers to formally approving a contractual obligation. To dis-affirm refers to back out of a contract wherein the parties to it return the consideration.
A minor, an individual below the age of eighteen years does not have capacity to a valid contract. A minor may void a contract before attaining majority.
When a contract has been signed by both the parties to it, with transaction closed, the contract shall be termed as executed.
In the given case, Luke a minor entered a contract to buy movies. Later upon attaining majority, Luke decides to disaffirm i.e not honor it. The contract in such a scenario shall be considered as formally approved i.e ratified by both parties if it was executed.
In such a case, Luke will have to honor the contract since the disaffirmation period i.e before his attaining majority has lapsed.