I think that the answer is B. ( the 2nd one from the top)
When you switch the sentence around such that the subject is being acted upon.
Here's what a sentence with active voice would look like:
John kicked the ball.
In this sentence, John is the subject, and he's kicking a ball. The subject is acting upon an object.
Now, what would happen if we made the ball the subject instead?
The ball was kicked by John.
This is passive voice. The ball is the subject, and it was acted upon by an object, in this case John.
Answer:
An amoral person has no sense of, or care for, what is right or wrong. There is no regard for either morality or immorality. Conversely, an immoral person knows the difference, yet he does the wrong thing, regardless. The amoral politician, for example, has no conscience and makes choices based on his own personal needs; he is oblivious to whether his actions are right or wrong. We used to think that people are born with a blank slate, but research has shown that people have an innate sense of morality. Of course, parents and the greater society can certainly nurture and develop morality and ethics in children. Humans are ethical and moral regardless of religion and God. People are not fundamentally good nor are they fundamentally evil. However, a Pew study found that atheists are much less likely than theists to believe that there are "absolute standards of right and wrong."
Explanation:
