<span>Some officials were legitimately concerned about protecting the colonies from attack and so viewed the quartering act as a logical means to do so, which would be a good reason for them. However, some official's desire was to cut costs. If the colonies were to be protected, why should they not pay for the soldiers?</span>
A cliff at nearby siccar point, he found something where the grey slate was different
Explanation:
Generally, people see cities as a very fun, enjoyable and relaxing While rural town is not as relaxing as cities.Since no one want to suffer in a place where ends do not meet, people prefer staying in cities than rural towns.
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
For people to associate their food, not with unhealthy lifestyles but au contraire with lifestyles that Evoque nutrition-consciousness.
<u>As we now, classical conditioning happens thanks to an association. In the olden days, doctors used to advertise cigarettes, for people to see cigarettes as a healthy habit. By associating doctors and cigarettes people will assume that smoking wasn't that bad because a Doctor who is a person concerned with health was recomending them. </u>
<u>The same principle applies here.</u>
Seeing an athlete recommending a certain brand of fast food would make people think that maybe, that particular brand is healthier than others.
